From: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Cc: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [9fans] http://swtch.com/plan9port/mk-all-20040301.tgz
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:03:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0501141003290.17396@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7DD37218104E31429E79EB0BB136800E11C55A@vargas.ntdom.cupdx>
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
> so what's more current these days- plan9port or actual Plan 9? Last I
> heard, plan9port's Venti was more functional than the real Plan 9
> variety...
goodness. We have to backport from 9ports to Plan 9?
ron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-14 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-14 6:55 Benjamin Huntsman
2005-01-14 17:03 ` Ronald G. Minnich [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-25 22:46 boyd, rounin
2005-01-14 2:15 ` Russ Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0501141003290.17396@linux.site \
--to=rminnich@lanl.gov \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
--cc=russcox@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).