Re: [9fans] nupas update

[erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>]

> and without use flags I end up having k*m packages instead of m.  So the
> question still comes to do I write it to allow 2^n^m possible combinations
> and document the two most common scenarios, or write 2*m package variants
> and leave it to the interested to populate any of the remaining 2^{k-2}
> permutations.  I'm still undecided, but I know then kinds of bugs that
> creep up when splitting trees like that.  (I guess like splitting hairs ;-)

at a minimum, ditch the use flags.

these complications are why i decided it
would be easier to just do 9atom.

- erik