Re: [9fans] fs hardware configuration

[Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 414 bytes --]

Well, for me, allow is just to too dangerous and we use it just
to upgrade system files including wstats. Before using it you can
always ask who to the file server. And it's sensible to put an
'echo dont forget to disllow' in whatever scripts you use to install
files. If you fell you really need it, I might change that for you
when I get some time, but I'd prefer not to put that into our regular
kernel.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1628 bytes --]

From: Kenji Arisawa <arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] fs hardware configuration
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 08:53:26 +0900
Message-ID: <400A7402-0651-11D7-9E52-000393A941BC@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>

Hello,

 >With or without the "allow/disallow" commands?  I disabled the former,
 >left the latter because I feel more comfortable that way.
I might asking too much...
I would like to have allow command that allows limited users, i.e.,
allow bootes arisawa

Kenji Arisawa