From: Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] First-timer help
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:12:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bcb772829a2d443471b14c19ba78d756@9netics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <451fd5c15dde48affa20a0c323f68847@terzarima.net>
would aan + drawterm be a solution?
> using VM/386 to multiplex window sessions is rather like virtualising the
> Unix system call layer to allow several IP stacks. it seems just
> a little heavy-handed. there is actually little difference between
> multi-user cpu servers and single-user terminals as far as the plan 9 kernel is concerned:
> mainly configuration and a few small policy differences.
>
> if each user is given a rio session, much as martin suggested,
> and it has its own name space (as with newns)
> it will use its own attach to the file server, and
> thus run with the desired file permissions.
>
> /dev/user can be set using cap(3).
>
> the host owner (/dev/hostowner) owns all devices, including cap(3),
> which works well in existing use `as intended', but for non-overlapping shared
> use of a single-user terminal would probably require something
> to set hostowner when it switches to a given user's session.
>
> the draw devices would all change ownership too, but if that makes
> things too open (because the current user can see all window contents),
> then it probably isn't hard to record ownership on draw directories
> (as for /net/tcp directories and a few other devices).
>
> the more serious problem is that there isn't a good paint program.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-19 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-17 18:27 John Floren
2005-07-17 18:26 ` Gorka guardiola
2005-07-17 19:18 ` John Floren
2005-07-17 19:20 ` Russ Cox
2005-07-17 23:12 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-07-18 9:23 ` Martin C. Atkins
2005-07-18 10:45 ` lucio
2005-07-18 18:24 ` Jack Johnson
2005-07-19 6:01 ` Martin C. Atkins
2005-07-19 13:29 ` Axel Belinfante
2005-07-19 13:57 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-19 16:11 ` Martin C. Atkins
2005-07-19 15:38 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-07-19 16:12 ` Skip Tavakkolian [this message]
2005-07-19 16:39 ` Martin C. Atkins
2005-07-21 2:30 ` Tim Newsham
2005-07-20 1:43 ` Brian L. Stuart
2005-07-18 13:08 ` Steve Simon
2005-07-21 2:17 ` Tim Newsham
2005-07-21 4:34 ` arisawa
2005-07-21 2:11 ` Tim Newsham
2005-07-21 2:57 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-22 9:44 ` Richard Miller
2005-07-22 9:49 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-07-22 15:09 ` Gorka guardiola
2005-07-22 14:14 ` Wes Kussmaul
2005-07-22 15:36 ` David Leimbach
2005-07-22 18:13 ` jmk
2005-07-23 3:30 ` LiteStar numnums
2005-07-23 16:19 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-21 16:12 ` Dave Eckhardt
2005-07-21 16:23 ` Russ Cox
2005-07-21 17:33 ` Wes Kussmaul
2005-07-21 18:13 ` Tim Newsham
2005-07-22 6:16 ` Dave Eckhardt
2005-07-22 6:20 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-07-21 23:00 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-22 1:28 ` David Leimbach
2005-07-22 1:48 ` Russ Cox
2005-07-22 3:54 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-22 5:57 ` lucio
2005-07-17 19:20 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-07-17 19:47 ` John Floren
2005-07-17 19:44 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-07-17 20:17 ` John Floren
2005-07-17 20:20 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-07-17 20:58 ` Russ Cox
2005-07-17 19:45 ` Christopher Nielsen
2005-07-17 23:17 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-07-18 0:33 ` Dave Lukes
2005-07-18 7:31 ` lucio
2005-07-18 15:24 ` Jack Johnson
2005-07-18 15:33 ` David Leimbach
2005-07-18 13:51 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-18 15:54 ` arisawa
2005-07-18 16:46 ` Jack Johnson
2005-07-17 19:29 ` Tim Wiess
2005-07-19 0:33 ` arisawa
2005-07-19 1:04 ` arisawa
2005-07-17 18:26 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-07-17 18:30 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-07-17 22:13 ` [9fans] " Dave Eckhardt
2005-07-18 20:42 [9fans] " Ben Huntsman
2005-07-19 15:48 Ben Huntsman
2005-07-19 16:01 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-19 16:07 ` Jack Johnson
2005-07-19 16:10 ` Russ Cox
2005-07-19 16:23 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-19 16:46 ` Martin C. Atkins
2005-07-19 16:40 ` Bakul Shah
2005-07-19 16:51 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-07-19 17:14 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2005-07-19 20:08 ` David Leimbach
2005-07-19 20:29 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2005-07-20 6:39 ` William K. Josephson
2005-07-19 20:05 ` David Leimbach
2005-07-20 4:40 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-20 5:02 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-07-20 8:46 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-07-20 13:44 ` David Leimbach
2005-07-20 0:57 ` Brian L. Stuart
2005-07-20 4:47 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-21 2:33 ` Brian L. Stuart
2005-07-21 3:02 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-21 3:46 ` Brian L. Stuart
2005-07-21 2:32 ` Tim Newsham
2005-07-19 16:33 Ben Huntsman
2005-07-20 4:09 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-20 16:38 Dave Eckhardt
2005-07-21 23:25 Francisco J. Ballesteros
2005-07-21 23:36 ` Devon H. O'Dell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bcb772829a2d443471b14c19ba78d756@9netics.com \
--to=9nut@9netics.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).