* [9fans] x10 cm11 interface
@ 2004-02-02 9:58 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-02-02 14:19 ` rog
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros @ 2004-02-02 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Hi,
I've pushed to /n/sources/nemo^(/sys/src/cmd/x10 /sys/man/1/x10)
a shell to command an x10 cm11 controller. We're using it here, although
that program is considered experimental.
hth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] x10 cm11 interface
2004-02-02 14:19 ` rog
@ 2004-02-02 14:17 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros @ 2004-02-02 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 227 bytes --]
Because I'm changing it right now to become x10(4) :-)
Seriously, I made it this saturday and I was more
concerned to make it work than I was about making it
a file system. So, if you want the section 4 version
stay tunned.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1946 bytes --]
From: rog@vitanuova.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] x10 cm11 interface
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:19:17 0000
Message-ID: <2286755c3bcddd9891b982a582af14e6@vitanuova.com>
> I've pushed to /n/sources/nemo^(/sys/src/cmd/x10 /sys/man/1/x10)
> a shell to command an x10 cm11 controller. We're using it here, although
> that program is considered experimental.
out of curiosity, why is this a shell and not a filesystem?
(or is x10(4) the "appropriate interface yet to come"?)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] x10 cm11 interface
2004-02-02 9:58 [9fans] x10 cm11 interface Fco.J.Ballesteros
@ 2004-02-02 14:19 ` rog
2004-02-02 14:17 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: rog @ 2004-02-02 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> I've pushed to /n/sources/nemo^(/sys/src/cmd/x10 /sys/man/1/x10)
> a shell to command an x10 cm11 controller. We're using it here, although
> that program is considered experimental.
out of curiosity, why is this a shell and not a filesystem?
(or is x10(4) the "appropriate interface yet to come"?)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-02 14:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-02 9:58 [9fans] x10 cm11 interface Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-02-02 14:19 ` rog
2004-02-02 14:17 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).