* [9fans] cpu server to vmware auth server ... so close ....
@ 2003-04-15 18:47 ron minnich
2003-04-15 19:53 ` rsc
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: ron minnich @ 2003-04-15 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
First, I'm using the linux dhcpd. The hardware is on 10.0.4.x net on eth0,
vmnet8 is 172.16.189.x.
The auth server is vmware host 172.16.189.132. The cpu server needs to be
172.16.189.133.
- route add 172.16.189.133 dev eth
set up the route
- in dhdpd.conf on linux, set up a shared-network 'net', containing
subnets 172.16.189.x and serving 172.16.189.133, and subnets
10.0.4.1. This allows dhcpd on linux to server 172.16.189.x addresses
on eth0.
- arp -s 172.16.189.133 <ethernet address of CPU server)
This is needed as at some point dhcpd on linux ARPs the cpu server
and 9load doesn't respond to arps. Interesting ...
at this point, the cpu server comes up, downloads a plan 9 kernel, and the
kernel comes up on the cpu server!
In fact all works well until ....
the cpu server arps the auth server. I can't get the arp from the cpu
server at .133 to be satisfied. I tried this:
arp -s -i eth0 172.16.189.132 <ethernet address of auth server>
but no dice.
Any clever ideas out there?
ron
p.s. on other option is to leave the cpu server with a 10. address and
hand-add a route into the auth server for that address. Anybody done hand
route stuff on Plan 9?
ron
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] cpu server to vmware auth server ... so close ....
2003-04-15 18:47 [9fans] cpu server to vmware auth server ... so close ron minnich
@ 2003-04-15 19:53 ` rsc
2003-04-15 20:33 ` ron minnich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: rsc @ 2003-04-15 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
if you've got the cpu and the auth server both
on the same vmware network, you should
be able to use the default configs with
no help from the linux dhcpd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] cpu server to vmware auth server ... so close ....
2003-04-15 19:53 ` rsc
@ 2003-04-15 20:33 ` ron minnich
2003-04-15 21:23 ` rsc
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: ron minnich @ 2003-04-15 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> if you've got the cpu and the auth server both
> on the same vmware network, you should
> be able to use the default configs with
> no help from the linux dhcpd.
the cpu server is on a different network. It is not vmware. It is on eth0.
Anyway I'm working it.
ron
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] cpu server to vmware auth server ... so close ....
2003-04-15 20:33 ` ron minnich
@ 2003-04-15 21:23 ` rsc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rsc @ 2003-04-15 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> the cpu server is on a different network. It is not vmware. It is on eth0.
your last email said it was on the vmware network.
you can edit the plan 9 routing table by echoing
to /net/iproute. but i don't think that will accomplish
anything useful. it seems like your problem is that
the cpu server can't find the auth server during boot,
not the other way around.
the whole point of a nat is usually to hide the
natted network. you're trying to break that,
and it's (unsurprisingly) difficult.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-15 21:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-15 18:47 [9fans] cpu server to vmware auth server ... so close ron minnich
2003-04-15 19:53 ` rsc
2003-04-15 20:33 ` ron minnich
2003-04-15 21:23 ` rsc
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).