* [9fans] A question on fossil
@ 2003-02-06 12:36 Kenji Arisawa
2003-02-06 13:11 ` Charles Forsyth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kenji Arisawa @ 2003-02-06 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Hello,
I have a question on /adm/users of fossil.
It seems that the first field of /adm/users of fossil is same as the
second field.
I don't know whether it must be same or not.
If it must be same, why did you make the format so redundant?
If it must not be same, what is the intent of usage?
Kenji Arisawa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] A question on fossil
2003-02-06 12:36 [9fans] A question on fossil Kenji Arisawa
@ 2003-02-06 13:11 ` Charles Forsyth
2003-02-06 19:27 ` Russ Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Charles Forsyth @ 2003-02-06 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 494 bytes --]
see fossilcons(8). here's an extract:
... The user table records a mapping
between uids and unames, as well as recording the leader and
members of each group. A uid is a string naming a user or
group and stored in the on-disk data structures. A uname is
the string naming a user or group and used in 9P protocol
messages. There is a distinction so that unames can be
safely reused, even though uids cannot. ...
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1818 bytes --]
From: Kenji Arisawa <arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] A question on fossil
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 21:36:36 +0900
Message-ID: <A1B93454-39CF-11D7-968A-000393A941BC@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
Hello,
I have a question on /adm/users of fossil.
It seems that the first field of /adm/users of fossil is same as the
second field.
I don't know whether it must be same or not.
If it must be same, why did you make the format so redundant?
If it must not be same, what is the intent of usage?
Kenji Arisawa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] A question on fossil
2003-02-06 13:11 ` Charles Forsyth
@ 2003-02-06 19:27 ` Russ Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russ Cox @ 2003-02-06 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1254 bytes --]
you mean see fossilcons(8):
Uname manipulates entries in the user table. There is no
distinction between users and groups: a user is a group with
one member. For each user, the user table records:
id the string used to represent this user in the on-disk
structures
name the string used to represent this user in the 9P proto-
col
leader
the group's leader (see stat(5) for a description of
the special privileges held by a group leader)
members
a comma-separated list of members in this group
The id and name are usually the same string, but need not
be. Once an id is used in file system structures archived
to Venti, it is impossible to change those disk structures,
and thus impossible to rename the id. The translation from
name to id allows the appearance of renaming the user even
though the on-disk structures still record the old name.
(In a conventional Unix file system, the id is stored as a
small integer rather than a string.) Leader and members are
names, not ids.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3953 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 494 bytes --]
see fossilcons(8). here's an extract:
... The user table records a mapping
between uids and unames, as well as recording the leader and
members of each group. A uid is a string naming a user or
group and stored in the on-disk data structures. A uname is
the string naming a user or group and used in 9P protocol
messages. There is a distinction so that unames can be
safely reused, even though uids cannot. ...
[-- Attachment #2.1.2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1818 bytes --]
From: Kenji Arisawa <arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] A question on fossil
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 21:36:36 +0900
Message-ID: <A1B93454-39CF-11D7-968A-000393A941BC@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
Hello,
I have a question on /adm/users of fossil.
It seems that the first field of /adm/users of fossil is same as the
second field.
I don't know whether it must be same or not.
If it must be same, why did you make the format so redundant?
If it must not be same, what is the intent of usage?
Kenji Arisawa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-06 19:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-06 12:36 [9fans] A question on fossil Kenji Arisawa
2003-02-06 13:11 ` Charles Forsyth
2003-02-06 19:27 ` Russ Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).