9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Abhey Shah <as234@york.ac.uk>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] the futility of #plan9 on irc
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 10:17:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd7c80683b09a1aeea5af7f67d089c9c@york.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e6050525094267cef8f9@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 774 bytes --]

Apologies for larding up the list with flippant  Simpsons' quotes but 
this one is appropriate for many situations.

  Homer: There are three ways to do things: the right way, the wrong 
way, and the Max Power way!
Bart: Isn't that just the wrong way?
Homer: Yeah, but faster!



On 25 May 2005, at 17:42, David Leimbach wrote:

>> The SCSI comment did get corrected, eventually, though
>> the comment about acme not being able to pipe a buffer
>> through an external program did not.
>>
>> Russ
>>
>
> Misinformation will continue to exist no matter what.  People just get
> stuff wrong.  They can even get it wrong here.  I don't think removing
> IRC is going to solve that problem.
>
> IRC just allows you to be wrong faster :)
>
> Dave
>
>


[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 282 bytes --]

from postmaster@ethel:
The following attachment had content that we can't
prove to be harmless.  To avoid possible automatic
execution, we changed the content headers.
The original header was:

	Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
	Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=US-ASCII

[-- Attachment #2.2: file.suspect --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 862 bytes --]

Apologies for larding up the list with flippant  Simpsons' quotes but
this one is appropriate for many situations.


<fontfamily><param>Verdana</param> Homer: There are three ways to do
things: the right way, the wrong way, and the Max Power way! 

Bart: Isn't that just the wrong way? 

Homer: Yeah, but faster!



</fontfamily>

On 25 May 2005, at 17:42, David Leimbach wrote:


<excerpt><excerpt>The SCSI comment did get corrected, eventually,
though

the comment about acme not being able to pipe a buffer

through an external program did not.


Russ


</excerpt>

Misinformation will continue to exist no matter what.  People just get

stuff wrong.  They can even get it wrong here.  I don't think removing

IRC is going to solve that problem.


IRC just allows you to be wrong faster :)


Dave



</excerpt>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-26  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-23 11:27 Russ Cox
2005-05-23 12:18 ` Vester Thacker
2005-05-23 17:44   ` Bruce Ellis
2005-05-23 17:46     ` Rob Pike
2005-05-23 18:43       ` Tim Newsham
2005-05-24  4:41     ` Dan Cross
2005-05-23 12:22 ` Uriel
2005-05-23 15:55   ` jmk
2005-05-24  0:54   ` Country Joe
2005-05-23 23:33 ` Chris Collins
2005-05-23 23:57   ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-05-24  0:03     ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-05-24  0:12       ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-05-24  4:29       ` Tim Newsham
2005-05-24 15:19         ` Russ Cox
2005-05-24 16:39           ` Vester Thacker
2005-05-24 16:43             ` William Josephson
2005-05-24 17:08               ` Vester Thacker
2005-05-26  4:02               ` McLone
2005-06-19 11:41             ` Vester Thacker
2005-06-19 11:43               ` Vester Thacker
2005-05-24 21:07           ` Chris Collins
2005-05-24 21:18             ` Russ Cox
2005-05-25 16:42               ` David Leimbach
2005-05-25 16:58                 ` Bruce Ellis
2005-05-26  9:17                 ` Abhey Shah [this message]
2005-05-24 21:20             ` Dan Cross
2005-05-24 21:31               ` Jack Johnson
2005-05-24 21:54                 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2005-05-26  4:04               ` McLone
2005-05-26  4:19                 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2005-05-26  4:29                 ` Dan Cross
2005-05-24  4:46       ` Dan Cross
2005-05-24  5:29         ` Lucio De Re
2005-05-24  0:14   ` Skip Tavakkolian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd7c80683b09a1aeea5af7f67d089c9c@york.ac.uk \
    --to=as234@york.ac.uk \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).