From: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>
To: Jack Johnson <knapjack@gmail.com>
Cc: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Newbie question on printing
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:59:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee9e417a050726085973b47502@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e35c0620507260846710ec8cc@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/26/05, Jack Johnson <knapjack@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/26/05, Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Modern Unix printing is a catastrophe. Plan 9 printing is only a mess.
>
> What's your take on IPP?
I don't care which protocol is used on the network. They all seem
simple enough. It's the software on the ends that is the disaster.
CUPS in particular is enormous and seems to prevent me from
printing more than it enables me to print.
My worst experience with CUPS was on Mac OS X. I was trying
to configure the printing via the GUI (I didn't even know that CUPS
was underneath), and CUPS kept seg faulting. It took hours
before I figured that was why the printer service kept ending up
in the "off" state.
I admit that being able to expose printer capabilities to clients
and have painless configuration is a great goal, and for Windows+CUPS
maybe it gets there, but sitting on Unix all I want to do is send
postscript and see the resulting pages come out of the printer.
And that is too hard far too often.
Amazingly, I think the Plan 9 lp is actually getting simpler as time
goes on. Slowly.
Russ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-26 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-26 10:29 Robert Raschke
2005-07-26 10:57 ` Steve Simon
2005-07-26 11:05 ` Russ Cox
2005-07-26 11:33 ` Robert Raschke
2005-07-26 12:06 ` Russ Cox
2005-07-26 15:46 ` Jack Johnson
2005-07-26 15:59 ` Russ Cox [this message]
2005-07-26 16:07 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-26 16:35 ` Jim McKie
2005-07-26 16:55 ` Jack Johnson
2005-07-26 17:28 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-07-26 18:49 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-07-26 16:44 ` Jack Johnson
2005-07-26 11:03 ` Russ Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee9e417a050726085973b47502@mail.gmail.com \
--to=russcox@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
--cc=knapjack@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).