Re: [9front] "Touching the Artwork" strikes again

[Jacob Moody <moody@posixcafe.org>]

On 8/11/23 07:31, Stuart Morrow wrote:
>> Hear hear.
> 
> This is in response to it being laughable, "a gem", to comment on two
> pairs of mutually-incompatible things appearing in the same software
> distribution.
> 
> I truly don't get why that's a hear-hear moment.

I was agreeing that you were being an entitled. That's all.

> 
>> I particularly like Stuart's part about refusing to write
>> the code.
> 
> I'm not a programmer (like the vast majority of people that ever used
> a Unix-like operating system), and to the extent that I _can_ be
> called one (is a hunt-and-peck typist "a typist"), I don't enjoy the
> process.

Then to be perfectly honest I don't care for your opinion on the system,
how it works, or how it should work. Learn to do it or stop bitching.
If you spent even a quarter of your time that you do bitching you would
know enough to actually provide something useful.

>> Sorry Stuart, people are not writing code for you, no matter how
>> much you bitch on the mailing list. I don't know how you got it in to your
>> head that we are here to serve you or your opinions. If you think you know
>> what the priorities should be, and how to best solve these problems then
>> just like fucking do it.
> 
> Really not seeing how you got it in your head(s?) that that's in my head.

Quite simple actually, you come in here demanding that we all bend to your
idea of what the order of things should be (screenlock before riow, making
it a fileserver, etc).

> 
> And now have I spend almost all of this thread dealing with either
> strawmen or misreadings.

Here I am spending time on someone that will never provide us with
anything of value and seems only interested in making noise in some
vein attempt at convincing people that, without being a programmer,
know how everyone else should program.

If you just fucked off from the mailing list, nothing of value would
be lost.