From: qwx@sciops.net
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] Minor Deviations in Section 4.3.11+ of the FQA?
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:34:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0153B4493FF103FD84D346BB2594B481@wopr.sciops.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91e7a735acb4d6d46839c333877a69c0@posteo.de>
On Wed Apr 17 08:18:27 +0200 2024, alex-ml@posteo.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have noticed minimal differences in the wording of the installer and
> the FQA in section 4.3.11 and following. Is this because I am using a
> nigthly build, or could I send a patch for the FQA?
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Alex
Hi,
It's possible that the scripts have been updated without taking the
fqa into account. You're welcome to send a patch for this or any
other discrepancies you've noticed. Thanks!
Cheers,
qwx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-17 6:17 alex-ml
2024-04-17 8:34 ` qwx [this message]
2024-04-17 11:32 ` alex-ml
2024-04-17 18:21 ` qwx
2024-04-18 2:10 ` sl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0153B4493FF103FD84D346BB2594B481@wopr.sciops.net \
--to=qwx@sciops.net \
--cc=9front@9front.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).