* [SPAM] Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes
@ 2019-01-10 8:49 qwx
2019-01-10 11:56 ` Ethan Gardener
2019-01-10 14:23 ` Stanley Lieber
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: qwx @ 2019-01-10 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1795 bytes --]
Spam detection software, running on the system "wopr.sciops.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
The administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: > If I leave the machine sitting idle for a while, the screen
goes > black, but the backlight is still on, and I can see very faint colors
> changing at the top of the screen. This sucks, because ther [...]
Content analysis details: (10.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[77.136.38.132 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?77.136.38.132>]
0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[77.136.38.132 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL,
https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
[77.136.38.132 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
2.1 NO_FM_NAME_IP_HOSTN No From name + hostname using IP address
[-- Attachment #2: original message before SpamAssassin --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1355 bytes --]
From: qwx <qwx@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 09:49:58 +0100
Message-ID: <5BDAB1A586F7214BF811C877C6236247@wopr.sciops.net>
> If I leave the machine sitting idle for a while, the screen goes
> black, but the backlight is still on, and I can see very faint colors
> changing at the top of the screen. This sucks, because there seems to
> be no way to recover. Every time a leave the office and return I have
> to reboot.
This seems to be an issue with newer intel graphics cards.
As a workaround, you can disable blanking:
; echo blanktime 0 >'#m'/mousectl
x250 is broadwell, you could also try adding its pci did to
/sys/src/cmd/aux/vga/igfx.c as a haswell ulx machine and try using
igfx with monitor=auto.
This will also disable blanking unless you also add the pci did to
the several checks in /sys/src/9/pc/vgaigfx.c.
x240 is haswell ulx and is reported to not work, so this might not
either.
Hope this helps,
qwx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [SPAM] Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes
2019-01-10 8:49 [SPAM] Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes qwx
@ 2019-01-10 11:56 ` Ethan Gardener
2019-01-10 14:23 ` Stanley Lieber
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ethan Gardener @ 2019-01-10 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, at 8:49 AM, qwx wrote:
> pts rule name description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
> [score: 0.0000]
> 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address
> 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
> [77.136.38.132 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
> 1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
> bl.spamcop.net
> [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?77.136.38.132>]
> 0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
> [77.136.38.132 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
> 3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
> 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL,
> https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
> [77.136.38.132 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
> 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
> dynamic-looking rDNS
> 2.1 NO_FM_NAME_IP_HOSTN No From name + hostname using IP address
>
>
> Email had 1 attachment:
> + Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes
> 1k (message/rfc822)
I can understand the lists because 9front-bugs accepted all spam for a while, but "No From name" makes no sense. Oh... unless they mean the From field contains only an email address. That's ridiculous, all spam comes with a full name in From. (That's how you know it's spam. *trollface*) The IP address parts are outside my comprehension.
--
2.1.3. Life with eternal upgrades
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [SPAM] Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes
2019-01-10 8:49 [SPAM] Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes qwx
2019-01-10 11:56 ` Ethan Gardener
@ 2019-01-10 14:23 ` Stanley Lieber
2019-01-10 15:02 ` Ethan Gardener
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stanley Lieber @ 2019-01-10 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
isn’t this saying the relay 77.136.38.132 is the culprit? how did that host get involved?
sl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [SPAM] Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes
2019-01-10 14:23 ` Stanley Lieber
@ 2019-01-10 15:02 ` Ethan Gardener
2019-01-10 15:11 ` Stanley Lieber
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ethan Gardener @ 2019-01-10 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
77.136.38.132 isn't in the headers I received
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [SPAM] Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes
2019-01-10 15:02 ` Ethan Gardener
@ 2019-01-10 15:11 ` Stanley Lieber
2019-01-10 16:22 ` Kurt H Maier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stanley Lieber @ 2019-01-10 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:02 AM, Ethan Gardener <eekee57@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
> 77.136.38.132 isn't in the headers I received
if i’m interpreting correctly, qwx’s origin message was marked spam by wopr.sciops.net because it was relayed to wopr through 77.136.38.132, which is listed in the spam database wopr checks before delivering messages.
i think all of this happened before qwx’s original message ever made it to the 9front mailing list server.
sl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [SPAM] Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes
2019-01-10 15:11 ` Stanley Lieber
@ 2019-01-10 16:22 ` Kurt H Maier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kurt H Maier @ 2019-01-10 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:11:30AM -0500, Stanley Lieber wrote:
>
> i think all of this happened before qwx’s original message ever made it to the 9front mailing list server.
This is correct. The spam flagging was my machine, and this was my
fault because I didn't tell qwx that all messages coming in on port 25
(as opposed to 465) are scanned. Because this message was sent from a
normal residential address, it set off all kinds of weird-ass alarms.
Sorry for the noise, folks.
khm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-10 16:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-10 8:49 [SPAM] Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes qwx
2019-01-10 11:56 ` Ethan Gardener
2019-01-10 14:23 ` Stanley Lieber
2019-01-10 15:02 ` Ethan Gardener
2019-01-10 15:11 ` Stanley Lieber
2019-01-10 16:22 ` Kurt H Maier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).