* Re: [9front] "function args not checked"
@ 2018-10-30 4:10 ori
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: ori @ 2018-10-30 4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: aiju, 9front
> does anyone object to making "function args not checked" an error?
> (possibly conditional on flags)
>
> it will fail to link either with "undefined reference" or type error
> anyway. turning it into a compiler error just makes it fail earlier.
>
> might also want to change that error message to something less cryptic at
> the same time
>
> aiju
Sounds good to me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-10-30 4:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-30 4:10 [9front] "function args not checked" ori
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).