Re: 9front@9front.org FAILED

Re: 9front@9front.org FAILED

[Stanley Lieber]

hi eekee!

your reply (and anyone else’s who included the original message in the body) was rejected because one of the MIME attachments was reported as HTML. My original went through because I have myself whitelisted. I should have realized the forwarded message was HTML when I sent it!

This blunt reject-all-HTML filter cheaply deters almost all spam.

sl

Re: 9front@9front.org FAILED

[sl]

For uknown reasons, iOS mail client insisted on replying to this message
in HTML, which was rejected by the list.  Here is my message again:

On Feb 13, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote:

>> While 9front (and Plan 9 from Bell Labs, for that matter) does not
>> ship with tex, the utilities listed above do perform operations on tex
>> files.  What should be the proper way to change these references?
>=20
> The reference string 'tex(1)' expliticly says there is a section one manpa=
ge of that name, and that's wrong.
>=20
> I would replace it with a reference to the TUG web site (https://tug.org)

Based on the man pages, it looks like 2ed shipped with it:

http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9_2nd_ed/1/tex

sl