Subject: Re: [9front] [patch] ethervgbe: add rx checksum offloading
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:36:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C3661C96255559388B569EC7442AC25B@eigenstate.org> (raw)
Quoth Arne Meyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Is hw offloading something we want? I ask because I think there is something wrong with ether8169 offloading and I'm working on a patch to fix or axe this.
if it makes a real difference in performance and isn't too complex, it may be worth it, but I suspect software is more than fast enough for
most of the cards we support.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-19 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-11 16:13 Arne Meyer
2022-11-11 17:01 ` hiro
2022-11-11 17:35 ` Arne Meyer
2022-11-19 20:09 ` Arne Meyer
2022-11-19 21:36 ` ori [this message]
2022-11-20 12:44 ` hiro
2022-12-07 19:12 ` hiro
2022-12-08 1:41 ` cinap_lenrek
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).