Re: [9front] Re: fqa: request for requests

[hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>]

eckart, what's the problem, we can all have a teambuilding event at
some gulag now!

and if you can't look over this superficial shit then you're wrong here anyway.

On 1/17/21, Eckard Brauer <eckard.brauer@gmx.de> wrote:
> as that discussion seems to suck here for a longer time, I'd throw in
> my 2 cents too.
>
> There are 2 very good reasons I read that list for (I'm not yet in a
> position to attend in the form of a writer, as I currently can't
> contribute much): The technical brilliance in a (for me) very
> interesting topic and it's humour, sometimes black and close to the
> borders, but usually far from politically correct-isms.
>
> First of that remains, but if the list is going to change to one of
> those softwashed and political-correct-dogmatic do-gooders lists, it
> starts to read more like a communist manifesto or the like, something I
> won't read for sure in my sparetime. That would degrade the before
> first level tech topics to 2nd level, and install or enforce a sort of
> wording check barrier at 1st level.
>
> Regarding the mentioned "shoah jokes" - it's not my sort of humour, but
> please keep in mind, that doing jokes with such topics is usually not
> really an expression of fun with that topics, but more one of shock or
> as a try to cope with the shock of something unbelievable, unthinkable
> or unimaginable. Nobody would usually expect people here to justify what
> happened in Shoah, even if we don't know personally, and as long as it
> doesn't take over the common language use here, I'd rather read even
> Shoah jokes (or other maybe inappropriate sentences) that way and keep
> discussions on political correctness of speech far outside.
>
> Up to just last week I was glad to learn from you all, since the start
> of exact this discussion it started to taste damned frowsty...
>