9front - general discussion about 9front
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] user none: cwfs vs hjfs
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:39:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E182DAEB-B2D0-484E-B4C0-DD81F975BDA2@stanleylieber.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFSF3XOGL2B68KYpAheRvwW2GEFHan=2rSu8CZB=xcXndL6+VQ@mail.gmail.com>

On January 22, 2021 10:01:34 AM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>well there's a lot of truth in that joke.
>
>and it really does look like they thought about proper security
>concepts. but providing a nice basis, an OS, and making sure every
>program uses it correctly are two different things.
>
>it might be that this dissonance can be explained some other way. for
>example if the people involved in making the email stuff were
>different folks, who didn't know how to fit into that security
>architecture.
>
>as email has proven to be a longer-term thing after all, perhaps it's
>worth fixing the broken upas assumptions so that upas fits again with
>the rest of this system.
>
>On 1/22/21, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote:
>> On January 22, 2021 4:14:24 AM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> do you seriously not follow what i'm saying here or are you just trying
>>>> to
>>>> map out a solution?
>>>
>>>i was trying to imagine out loud how the existing security
>>>architecture could be utilized as fully as possible.
>>>
>>>i am not saying it is the best solution, just trying to stay on the
>>>track that the bell-labs people have laid out.
>>>
>>>i am not saying we didn't break it. but if we know the intent of the
>>>basic architecture we might be able to fix it without creating a
>>>second system.
>>>
>>
>> yeah, i'm with you there. i really think they just tried to sidestep this
>> whole issue by stipulating anyone with fs access was trusted. remember the
>> "joke" about securing the fs by locking the server room door?
>>
>> sl
>>
>

there is definitely a disconnect between "everyone uses the same fs" and the way they implemented all these services for mere users.

sl

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19 20:16 Stanley Lieber
2021-01-19 20:36 ` hiro
2021-01-19 20:51 ` Silas McCroskey
2021-01-19 20:57   ` Silas McCroskey
2021-01-19 21:35     ` Stanley Lieber
2021-01-19 21:54       ` hiro
2021-01-19 21:58         ` Anthony Martin
2021-01-21 16:22           ` ori
2021-01-21 17:05             ` sirjofri
2021-01-21 17:36               ` Stanley Lieber
2021-01-21 22:01                 ` hiro
2021-01-21 22:15                   ` Stanley Lieber
2021-01-21 22:51                     ` hiro
2021-01-21 22:55                       ` hiro
2021-01-21 23:26                         ` Silas McCroskey
2021-01-21 23:55                           ` Stanley Lieber
2021-01-22  0:13                             ` Silas McCroskey
2021-01-23 15:08                               ` cinap_lenrek
2021-01-22  0:24                             ` ori
2021-01-22  0:53                               ` Stanley Lieber
2021-01-22  9:53                                 ` hiro
2021-01-22  0:10                           ` Anthony Martin
2021-01-21 23:44                         ` Stanley Lieber
2021-01-22  0:00                           ` Silas McCroskey
2021-01-22  9:14                           ` hiro
2021-01-22 14:51                             ` Stanley Lieber
2021-01-22 15:01                               ` hiro
2021-01-22 15:39                                 ` Stanley Lieber [this message]
2021-01-22  9:41                           ` hiro
2021-01-21 23:00                       ` Stanley Lieber
2021-01-21 23:08                         ` Stanley Lieber
2021-01-19 23:04         ` Silas McCroskey
2021-01-20  1:12           ` hiro
2021-01-20  1:50             ` Stanley Lieber
2021-01-19 21:07   ` Stanley Lieber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E182DAEB-B2D0-484E-B4C0-DD81F975BDA2@stanleylieber.com \
    --to=sl@stanleylieber.com \
    --cc=9front@9front.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).