From: "Jeff Henrikson" <jehenrik@yahoo.com>
To: "Gerd Stolpmann" <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
Cc: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 19:19:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000d01c1c95b$866bc060$0b01a8c0@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C8C9FE1.2060904@gerd-stolpmann.de>
> In O'Caml replacing library X by a newer version usually means that
> all libraries Y that depend on X must be recompiled. And there is no
> guarantee that Y can be compiled at all. I do not see any chance to
> change this, it is a consequence of strict typing.
I don't see this. I can believe that consequences of implementation choices which have been made prohibit this. For hypothetical
example, inlining behavior which could not be disabled on public interfaces would be a problem. (I don't think this particular
thing happens in ocaml.) But I certainly don't see "a consequence of strict typing." Can you give a specific example?
Jeff Henrikson
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-12 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-11 4:28 Mark D. Anderson
2002-03-11 7:12 ` Mattias Waldau
2002-03-11 12:15 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-12 0:19 ` Jeff Henrikson [this message]
2002-03-12 22:00 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-20 11:20 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-03-20 11:43 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-03-20 17:16 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-03-20 12:53 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-20 13:05 ` Johan Georg Granström
2002-03-20 13:40 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-20 19:46 ` Alain Frisch
2002-03-20 20:39 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-03-20 21:16 ` Markus Mottl
2002-03-21 9:07 ` Warp
2002-03-21 10:18 ` Christopher Quinn
2002-03-21 18:13 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-03-21 14:13 ` Jeff Henrikson
2002-03-21 14:13 ` [Caml-list] Type-safe DLL's with OO (was DLL-hell of O'Caml) Tim Freeman
2002-03-21 18:10 ` [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml Xavier Leroy
2002-03-21 18:39 ` Sven
2002-03-21 19:22 ` james woodyatt
2002-03-21 19:43 ` Jeff Henrikson
2002-03-22 2:02 ` Brian Rogoff
2002-03-22 10:11 ` Warp
2002-03-21 18:50 ` Sven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-22 10:24 Dave Berry
2002-03-22 10:14 Dave Berry
2002-03-02 0:11 [Caml-list] troubleshooting problem related to garbage collection james woodyatt
2002-03-02 7:57 ` [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml Mattias Waldau
2002-03-02 11:56 ` Markus Mottl
2002-03-02 21:40 ` Alexander V. Voinov
2002-03-02 14:46 ` Alain Frisch
2002-03-02 19:00 ` Chris Hecker
2002-03-02 19:42 ` Mattias Waldau
2002-03-02 22:41 ` Chris Hecker
2002-03-03 15:56 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-03-04 9:57 ` Sven
2002-03-04 12:20 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000d01c1c95b$866bc060$0b01a8c0@mit.edu' \
--to=jehenrik@yahoo.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).