From: "Johan Georg Granström" <georg.g@home.se>
To: "Gerd Stolpmann" <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
Cc: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:05:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007601c1d00f$f3b81960$0c6fa8c0@invariant.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C98863F.6060208@gerd-stolpmann.de>
> > I think that rather than being a consequence of strict typing, it is a
> > possible consequence of treating modules as more-or-less first class,
> > if you use a representation of modules in which adding a new function
> > does not preserve binary compatibility. Does O'Caml do that?
>
> It is also a matter of typing because even toplevel modules can be
> used to parameterize functors. So adding a new function may break
> functor applications.
I don't understand this, can you give an example of such
a case?
Yours,
- Johan Granström
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-20 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-11 4:28 Mark D. Anderson
2002-03-11 7:12 ` Mattias Waldau
2002-03-11 12:15 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-12 0:19 ` Jeff Henrikson
2002-03-12 22:00 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-20 11:20 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-03-20 11:43 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-03-20 17:16 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-03-20 12:53 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-20 13:05 ` Johan Georg Granström [this message]
2002-03-20 13:40 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-20 19:46 ` Alain Frisch
2002-03-20 20:39 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-03-20 21:16 ` Markus Mottl
2002-03-21 9:07 ` Warp
2002-03-21 10:18 ` Christopher Quinn
2002-03-21 18:13 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-03-21 14:13 ` Jeff Henrikson
2002-03-21 14:13 ` [Caml-list] Type-safe DLL's with OO (was DLL-hell of O'Caml) Tim Freeman
2002-03-21 18:10 ` [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml Xavier Leroy
2002-03-21 18:39 ` Sven
2002-03-21 19:22 ` james woodyatt
2002-03-21 19:43 ` Jeff Henrikson
2002-03-22 2:02 ` Brian Rogoff
2002-03-22 10:11 ` Warp
2002-03-21 18:50 ` Sven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-22 10:24 Dave Berry
2002-03-22 10:14 Dave Berry
2002-03-02 0:11 [Caml-list] troubleshooting problem related to garbage collection james woodyatt
2002-03-02 7:57 ` [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml Mattias Waldau
2002-03-02 11:56 ` Markus Mottl
2002-03-02 21:40 ` Alexander V. Voinov
2002-03-02 14:46 ` Alain Frisch
2002-03-02 19:00 ` Chris Hecker
2002-03-02 19:42 ` Mattias Waldau
2002-03-02 22:41 ` Chris Hecker
2002-03-03 15:56 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-03-04 9:57 ` Sven
2002-03-04 12:20 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='007601c1d00f$f3b81960$0c6fa8c0@invariant.se' \
--to=georg.g@home.se \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).