* Re: [Caml-list] Duplicated messages
@ 2002-02-07 19:23 Christopher Milton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Milton @ 2002-02-07 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matti Jokinen; +Cc: caml-list
Sorry, that was meant for the list.
--- Christopher Milton <cmiltonperl@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Matti Jokinen <moj@utu.fi> wrote:
> > > I get all messages twice or three times right now, does
> > > someone else have the same problem?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> I continue to receive some non-announce duplicated messages.
> I don't think I subscribed to caml-announce, either, so I
> shouldn't get two of those. But not all messages are doubled...
=====
Christopher M. Milton
cmiltonperl@yahoo.com
Phone 719/380-7665
Colorado Springs, CO
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Caml-list] Syntax change
@ 2002-02-05 10:50 Christian Gillot
2002-02-05 16:52 ` [Caml-list] Duplicated messages Mattias Waldau
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christian Gillot @ 2002-02-05 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
Hi,
As a newbie, I feeled puzzled by the fact that there's two
syntaxes for ocaml. I understand camlp4 is really useful to
extend ocaml on a _project-basis_ but it's awkward that there
is two syntaxes for ocaml. It's pretty clear that the revised
syntax is a progress. Nevertheless, it'll stay in its current
confidential use as long as it's not the default syntax, aka the
standard syntax. Because the newbie will have a natural tendance
to use the "standard" syntax.
Moreover as I said before it's puzzling to have two syntaxes widely
used. Which one use ? And if you use one, when you'll see the other
one you'll say : What do this code mean ? That's why all the ocaml
keywords are only avaible and used in english rather than alse
a french version, a deutsch version, etc. Clearly we need a compromise.
As Daniel said before the INRIA team will not push forward another
syntax. So what about the process in which is involved Perl6 ? I mean
all the talented people write RFC and let the users comment them in order
to reach a benefit for everybody ? That would be great and moreover
a "open" approach to the problem.
My 0.02 €
--
Christian Gillot <cgillot@gruposbd.com>
GNU/Linux developer
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-07 19:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-07 19:23 [Caml-list] Duplicated messages Christopher Milton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-05 10:50 [Caml-list] Syntax change Christian Gillot
2002-02-05 16:52 ` [Caml-list] Duplicated messages Mattias Waldau
2002-02-05 18:07 ` Matti Jokinen
2002-02-06 7:16 ` malc
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).