caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
To: Karl Zilles <zilles@1969.ws>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] inconsistent assumptions over interface Pervasives
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:11:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030930171133.GA6754@iliana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F788479.1030408@1969.ws>

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:14:01PM -0700, Karl Zilles wrote:
> I've just upgraded to 3.07, and I'm recompiling some of my code that 
> depends heavily on libraries.  It seems that code compiled with earlier 
> versions of the standard libraries is not compatible with code compiled 
> under 3.07:
> 
> "The files /usr/local/lib/ocaml/pervasives.cmi and 
> /usr/local/lib/ocaml/site-lib/pcre/pcre.cmi make inconsistent 
> assumptions over interface Pervasives"
> 
> This is not a problem for me right now, since I have source to the 
> libraries I'm using, but it seems like it would be a problem if people 
> distribute commercial libraries for OCaml.

That is the problem with commercial distributions, and the people doing
commercial distributions of stuff should be prepared to pay the price of
it (that is recompiling when there is a new ocaml release). Doing otherwise
would be unhonest to your customers, but then this has not stopped
people from doing so over the past, altough with the advent of open
source, i guess that less and less customer will be willing to purchase
software in these conditions.

Friendly,

Sven Luther

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-30 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-29 19:14 Karl Zilles
2003-09-29 21:30 ` Pierre Weis
2003-09-30 17:11 ` Sven Luther [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030930171133.GA6754@iliana \
    --to=sven.luther@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=zilles@1969.ws \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).