* [Caml-list] int_of_char vs Char.code
@ 2011-01-21 12:10 Joel Reymont
2011-01-21 12:15 ` Maxence Guesdon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joel Reymont @ 2011-01-21 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
I noticed that cryptokit uses Char.code to convert from char to int.
I also found int_of_char.
Should I prefer one over another for performance reasons?
Thanks, Joel
---
http://wagerlabs.com | @wagerlabs | http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] int_of_char vs Char.code
2011-01-21 12:10 [Caml-list] int_of_char vs Char.code Joel Reymont
@ 2011-01-21 12:15 ` Maxence Guesdon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maxence Guesdon @ 2011-01-21 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Reymont; +Cc: caml-list
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:10:40 +0000
Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that cryptokit uses Char.code to convert from char to int.
>
> I also found int_of_char.
>
> Should I prefer one over another for performance reasons?
Both are defined the same way:
external int_of_char : char -> int = "%identity" [pervasives.ml]
external code: char -> int = "%identity" [char.ml]
so you can assume the same performance.
Regards,
Maxence
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-21 12:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-21 12:10 [Caml-list] int_of_char vs Char.code Joel Reymont
2011-01-21 12:15 ` Maxence Guesdon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).