caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hendrik Boom <hendrik@topoi.pooq.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] where are we on the Hoogle for OCaml front?
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:02:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170206140253.GA20685@topoi.pooq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67BCE44C836B466EBD22FC5CE5A4CD13@erratique.ch>

On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 04:46:02PM +0100, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
> On Saturday, 4 February 2017 at 04:58, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> > For search by type signature you can use Jun Furuse's OCamlOScope:
> 
> I'm a little bit curious. While I can see the benefit of having general full text search over value identifiers, type identifier and doc strings I was always a little bit dubious about type signature search -- in the end ML types for themselves are a rather weak specification language (I'm not talking about the invariants you may hide behind those of course).
> 
> So beyond curiosity searches are actually people seriously using this to lookup a value they might need ? 

Search on parts of the type, even.  It is very useful to find all the 
functions that do anything with values of a particular type in order 
to find out what you can do with it.  As well as how you can produce 
values of that type.

-- hendrik

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-06 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-27 14:22 [Caml-list] FroCoS 2017 - 2nd Call for Papers Geoff Sutcliffe
2017-01-27 16:39 ` [Caml-list] where are we on the Hoogle for OCaml front? Francois BERENGER
2017-02-04  3:58   ` Jacques Garrigue
2017-02-06 14:35     ` Francois BERENGER
2017-02-06 15:46     ` Daniel Bünzli
2017-02-06 14:02       ` Hendrik Boom [this message]
2017-02-06 16:00         ` Daniel Bünzli
2017-02-06 16:07           ` Ivan Gotovchits
2017-02-06 16:11             ` Ivan Gotovchits
2017-02-06 16:34             ` Daniel Bünzli
2017-02-06 16:46               ` Ivan Gotovchits
2017-02-06 16:55                 ` Frédéric Bour
2017-02-06 16:01         ` Ivan Gotovchits
2017-02-06 16:06           ` Daniel Bünzli
2017-02-06 17:46       ` Francois BERENGER

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170206140253.GA20685@topoi.pooq.com \
    --to=hendrik@topoi.pooq.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).