Re: [Caml-list] where are we on the Hoogle for OCaml front?

[Ivan Gotovchits <ivg@ieee.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1254 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
wrote:

> On Monday, 6 February 2017 at 15:02, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > It is very useful to find all the
> > functions that do anything with values of a particular type in order
> > to find out what you can do with it. As well as how you can produce
> > values of that type.
>
> Sure but boolean queries on type identifiers seems enough for this. Of
> course you can always wish to be more precise --- I want this type to
> appear in that position --- but I'm not sure that's an information need
> users often have.



That's why the search should be up-to some isomorphism, e.g.,

     int -> float -> bool


is isomoprhic to

   float -> int -> bool


The seach should also work correctly with lots of aliases, since it is
usual when the same type or value in OCaml has mutliple names. The seach
should also ignore parameter names,
as this is not what a user can know in advance.



>
>
> D
>
>
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2333 bytes --]