* [Caml-list] unique record types
@ 2002-06-07 2:03 John D. Barnett
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: John D. Barnett @ 2002-06-07 2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
The ocaml documentation mentions that field names in a record must be
unique (within a module), although the ocaml book mentions an
experimental language feature to get around this, that seems no longer
available.
My question is, why is this so? Can anyone recommend a paper explaining
difficulties/solutions to implementing record types in the ML-style type
system?
Thanks,
-John
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-06-07 1:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-07 2:03 [Caml-list] unique record types John D. Barnett
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).