From: orbitz@ezabel.com
To: Eray Ozkural <examachine@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rajchenbach-Teller <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr>,
Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>,
Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com>,
caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Purity and lazyness
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:29:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7B166A75-88A4-41BC-A26F-A2CC8B6E30FC@ezabel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimdUwEkDdLQ10Ahg+qDskQtzqWfiknsP8oj6C=y@mail.gmail.com>
I believe you are thinking of 'Timber'?
On Jan 7, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 6:38 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr
> > wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I wouldn't classify Erlang as "pure":
> sending and receiving messages -- which are two of the most
> important primitives in Erlang -- are definitely side-effects.
> Also, asynchronous error-checking, Mnesia, etc. look quite impure to
> me.
>
> I also vaguely remember Simon Peyton-Jones declaring something along
> the lines of "The next Haskell will be strict".
>
>
> There was a strict compiler for Haskell, whatever happened to it?
> Most times I found it cumbersome to deal with the performance
> effects of default laziness.
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University,
> Ankara
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
> http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-07 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-07 15:35 Dario Teixeira
2011-01-07 16:07 ` Damien Doligez
2011-01-07 16:38 ` David Rajchenbach-Teller
2011-01-07 18:16 ` Holger Weiß
2011-01-07 20:22 ` Eray Ozkural
2011-01-07 20:29 ` orbitz [this message]
2011-01-07 20:30 ` Joel Reymont
2011-01-07 20:33 ` Eray Ozkural
2011-01-08 9:44 ` Jesper Louis Andersen
2011-01-07 17:21 ` Alain Frisch
2011-01-07 17:46 ` Christophe Raffalli
2011-01-07 18:11 ` Holger Weiß
2011-01-07 18:52 ` Brian Hurt
2011-01-07 19:32 ` Petter Urkedal
2011-01-07 20:25 ` Eray Ozkural
2011-01-09 16:11 ` Jon Harrop
2011-01-10 6:27 ` Eray Ozkural
2011-01-07 19:17 ` Florian Weimer
[not found] ` <AANLkTikxCSQ+0XkOmSVDb3EWq_2oQ0pac3bDgc7f7jq+@mail.gmail.com>
2011-01-07 20:52 ` bluestorm
2011-01-09 16:15 ` Jon Harrop
2011-01-08 0:26 ` Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva
2011-01-08 9:28 ` Christophe Raffalli
2011-01-08 22:47 ` Florian Weimer
2011-01-09 10:00 ` Petter Urkedal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7B166A75-88A4-41BC-A26F-A2CC8B6E30FC@ezabel.com \
--to=orbitz@ezabel.com \
--cc=David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=damien.doligez@inria.fr \
--cc=darioteixeira@yahoo.com \
--cc=examachine@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).