* Re: [Caml-list] Follow up to: Status of the OCaml RISC-V port
[not found] <20180409135302.436rs72jrexqkzlt@annexia.org>
@ 2018-04-09 14:11 ` Nicolás Ojeda Bär
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nicolás Ojeda Bär @ 2018-04-09 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard W.M. Jones; +Cc: OCaml Mailing List
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the update!
As for the tests:
- tests/asmgen: this one has not been ported, so it is not supposed to work;
- tests/lib-dynlink-native/main: ditto, but I never got around to see
why it fails exactly;
- tests/unboxed-primitive-args: this one **is** supposed to pass, will
investigate.
Best wishes,
Nicolás
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rich@annexia.org> wrote:
>
> Previously ...
> https://inbox.ocaml.org/caml-list/20180226142050.r5bautl4orekd3rf@annexia.org/T/
>
> The Fedora project recently received the HiFive Unleashed U540 board,
> courtesy of SiFive Inc. I thought I'd follow up the thread with
> observations on how OCaml (with nojb's patch) works on the real
> hardware.
>
> From a development point of view the board is a mixed bag. It's quite
> fast, but because it has no I/O ports except ethernet (no SATA for
> example) it requires an awkward installation where you have a second
> machine next to it acting as a file server and use NFS/NBD/iSCSI/etc
> root support.
>
> I built and tested OCaml from source on the board. There are some
> test failures which I need to investigate. (See also attachments.)
>
> I also rebuilt a selection of OCaml packages from Fedora on the board
> using Fedora's ocaml 4.06 (which has nojb's patch). These rebuilt
> fine so I guess the test failures don't affect real world jobs much.
>
> Hope this is interesting,
>
> Rich.
--
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread