Re: [Caml-list] Protobuf for ocaml

[Maxime Ransan <maxime.ransan@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1789 bytes --]

The difference between ppx_deriving_protobuf and ocaml-protoc is that the
former generates a protobuf schema from an OCaml type while the later
generates the OCaml type from a protobuf schema. They are both using the
same runtime library for the binary encoding.

Although I have written ocaml-protoc as a personal project, it has been
used successfully in a professional context to interface with apache mesos.


On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 8:10 PM Kenneth Adam Miller <
kennethadammiller@gmail.com> wrote:

> The space complexity is ridiculous (at least X^2, possibly 2^n), it isn't
> as convenient as any of the others in allowing you to derive your own
> specs, it's horribly written code that uses ref and doesn't conform to
> OCaml conventions, it caused a lot of crashing on our end, only works for a
> particular compile target until I went to update it, the Makefile is an
> awful unmaintainable and unreadable mess, the language it defines is
> unnecessary and it's hard to get anything to change.
>
> We (me and some team mates) had this forced on us for the features we
> required, which was to be able to get data in and out of ocaml to other
> languages, and wanted to use it for a large project. It ended up causing a
> lot of unnecessary and unwanted slow down in development, both for our
> cases and for CMU's BAP. They had the same problems, and everyone that has
> touched it had to do unwanted work trying to get it to reliably do what it
> advertises.
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Louis Roché <mail@louisroche.net> wrote:
>
>> Can you give more details please ?
>
>
>>
>> > On 11 Feb 2018, at 04:56, Kenneth Adam Miller <
>> kennethadammiller@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > **Dont use piqi!** It's really terrible code.
>>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2684 bytes --]