caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arlen Cox <arlencox@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Applicative Functor Madness
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:29:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHEcMuF5waGp8Fs95XiGeJ=sS5p=CxUt=1V_50HUWQZKt6HuXQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1736 bytes --]

Hi everyone,

I'm having some trouble getting some code that relies heavily on
applicative functors to type check.  Does anyone know what I'm doing wrong
with this?

module type S = sig
  module T : Set.OrderedType
  module ST : module type of Set.Make(T)
end

module Make(T_in : Set.OrderedType) : S (* <- ERROR *)
  with module T = T_in
   and module ST = Set.Make(T_in)
= struct
  module T = T_in
  module ST = Set.Make(T_in)
end

I get the following error message referencing the above point in the
program.

Error: In this `with' constraint, the new definition of ST
       does not match its original definition in the constrained signature:
       ...
       Type declarations do not match:
         type t = Set.Make(T_in).t
       is not included in
         type t = Set.Make(T).t
       File "set.mli", line 68, characters 4-10: Expected declaration
       File "set.mli", line 68, characters 4-10: Actual declaration

It seems to me that since T = T_in, but applicative functors should make
the type of Set.Make(T) = Set.Make(T_in).  Does this not work this way?

Note that if I change the definition of S slightly, the same definition of
Make now type checks:

module type S = sig
  module T : Set.OrderedType
  module ST : Set.S with type elt = T.t
end

This solution is undesirable because I have a number of modules whose types
would require an excessive number of "with module ... = ..." constraints to
constrain in this way.  Is there a better way of getting this to type check?

Thank you,
Arlen

-- 
Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2050 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2018-09-20 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-20 14:29 Arlen Cox [this message]
2018-09-20 16:02 ` Arlen Cox
2018-09-21  0:10 ` Jacques Garrigue
2018-09-21  1:25   ` Arlen Cox
2018-09-21  5:54     ` Jacques Garrigue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHEcMuF5waGp8Fs95XiGeJ=sS5p=CxUt=1V_50HUWQZKt6HuXQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=arlencox@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).