[Caml-list] [ANN] Core_profiler 112.19.00

[Caml-list] [ANN] Core_profiler 112.19.00

[Jeremie Dimino]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 630 bytes --]

I am pleased to announce the first release of Core_profiler. It is a
library that helps you profile programs and estimate various
costs. The library comes in three different flavors:

- "disabled" which does nothing, so that one can leave probes in a
  program without performance penalty
- "online" to print live stats
- "offline" to store data on disk for later analysis

There github project has a wiki page to help you get started with the
library:

  https://github.com/janestreet/core_profiler/wiki/GettingStarted

And Core_profiler is available in opam:

  opam install core_profiler

-- 
Jeremie Dimino, for the Core team

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1017 bytes --]

Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Core_profiler 112.19.00

[Christian Neukirchen]

Jeremie Dimino <jdimino@janestreet.com> writes:

> I am pleased to announce the first release of Core_profiler. It is a
> library that helps you profile programs and estimate various
> costs. The library comes in three different flavors:
>
> - "disabled" which does nothing, so that one can leave probes in a
>   program without performance penalty
> - "online" to print live stats
> - "offline" to store data on disk for later analysis

This sounds very useful to me.

> There github project has a wiki page to help you get started with the
> library:
>
>   https://github.com/janestreet/core_profiler/wiki/GettingStarted
>
> And Core_profiler is available in opam:
>
>   opam install core_profiler

Are these dependencies wrong?

I see
core_profiler: core >= 112.17.00 & < 112.18.00
core_profiler: re2 <= 111.07.00
re2-111.06.00: core = 111.06.00

(And a further clash on the OCaml version.)

I think the re2 dependency should be relaxed.
It seems to be fine to build against re2.112.06.00 at least...

-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org

Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Core_profiler 112.19.00

[Jeremie Dimino]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 501 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Christian Neukirchen <
chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:

> Are these dependencies wrong?
>
> I see
> core_profiler: core >= 112.17.00 & < 112.18.00
> core_profiler: re2 <= 111.07.00
> re2-111.06.00: core = 111.06.00
>

Ah, indeed. I'll fix them, thanks!

(And a further clash on the OCaml version.)
>

The OCaml version constraint seems fine: ocaml-version >= 4.02.1. It might
work with older version of OCaml but it has only been tested with OCaml
4.02.1.

-- 
Jeremie

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1203 bytes --]