From: Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@qlogic.com>
To: <brogoff@speakeasy.net>
Cc: David Monniaux <David.Monniaux@ens.fr>,
hermanns <jan_hermanns@gmx.de>,
"caml-list@inria.fr" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why are arithmetic functions not polymorph?
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 13:02:33 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0305231259070.2037-100000@eagle.ancor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305230850350.10692-100000@grace.speakeasy.net>
On Fri, 23 May 2003 brogoff@speakeasy.net wrote:
> > SML has a kind of operator overloading, but I don't know the details.
>
> SML doesn't allow the user to define overloadings, and that is an
> abomination. Java is similarly abominable.
>
Ocaml allows you to define *new* operators to your heart's content. You
just can't overload the meanings of old operators. And frankly, I don't
find that abominable at all. I don't want to turn this into a C++
flamefest (had one of those already this week), but in my experience
operator overloading is *really* *really* bad.
Brian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-23 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-22 22:31 hermanns
2003-05-22 23:10 ` Brian Hurt
2003-05-23 1:34 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-05-23 9:56 ` David Monniaux
2003-05-23 10:13 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2003-05-23 16:34 ` brogoff
2003-05-23 18:02 ` Brian Hurt [this message]
2003-05-23 18:12 ` Matt Gushee
2003-05-23 20:25 ` brogoff
2003-05-23 21:15 ` Brian Hurt
2003-05-23 21:23 ` brogoff
2003-06-03 3:42 ` John Max Skaller
2003-06-03 4:10 ` Oleg Trott
2003-06-03 6:57 ` John Max Skaller
2003-06-03 3:25 ` John Max Skaller
2003-06-06 7:08 ` easy print and read (was: [Caml-list] Why are arithmetic functions not polymorph?) Oleg Trott
2003-06-06 10:46 ` Pierre Weis
2003-06-06 16:40 ` brogoff
2003-06-07 10:59 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2003-06-07 14:44 ` Jun.Furuse
2003-06-08 6:32 ` brogoff
2003-06-08 8:49 ` Chris Hecker
2003-06-09 9:40 ` Jun.Furuse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0305231259070.2037-100000@eagle.ancor.com \
--to=brian.hurt@qlogic.com \
--cc=David.Monniaux@ens.fr \
--cc=brogoff@speakeasy.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=jan_hermanns@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).