From: Martin Jambon <martin_jambon@emailuser.net>
To: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [oliver: Re: [Caml-list] Should be INSIDE STANDARD-LIB: Hashtbl.keys]
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 15:30:53 +0800 (HKT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404241527200.1475-100000@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040423201039.GH271@first.in-berlin.de>
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Oliver Bandel wrote:
> When you want to report each key only once, you need a temporarily
> hash to sort out multiple stuff. This, because the fold-function
> reports EACH binding (and it good that it does it), and therefore
> multiple bindings to a key will occur more than once.
> The function has to sort them out.
>
> I'm shure it's more efficient to implement that inside the
> hashtbl-module. (I've not looked into the sources, but suppose
> that it will be more performant, when a Hashtbl.keys will
> be implemented inside the Hashtbl-module.)
Please, tell me why you don't like my solution:
http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200404/msg00527.html
Best regards,
Martin
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-24 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-23 20:10 Oliver Bandel
2004-04-24 7:30 ` Martin Jambon [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-23 20:10 Oliver Bandel
2004-04-23 20:09 Oliver Bandel
2004-04-23 20:09 Oliver Bandel
2004-04-23 20:09 Oliver Bandel
2004-04-24 3:00 ` skaller
2004-04-24 4:46 ` Jon Harrop
2004-04-24 10:39 ` Oliver Bandel
2004-04-25 18:54 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2004-04-25 20:06 ` Jon Harrop
2004-04-26 10:14 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-26 17:13 ` Jon Harrop
2004-04-24 6:42 ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2004-04-24 19:12 ` skaller
2004-04-24 8:56 ` Oliver Bandel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0404241527200.1475-100000@localhost \
--to=martin_jambon@emailuser.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).