caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John J Lee <jjl@pobox.com>
To: Caml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] GC and file descriptors
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:02:48 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311172249120.1582@alice> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171422420.5009-100000@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Brian Hurt wrote:
[...]
> The O'Reilly book will be a great benefit.  Let me know when it comes out,

It's coming out in print?  Great!


> I want a copy.  But I don't know how close to mainstream it is.  Perl,
> Python, and Ruby are scripting languages, still mainly used for short,
> single-person, throw-away projects.

The fact that they're often *used* in that way doesn't preclude their use
as applications languages -- far from it: they shine in that department
(though I put Perl in a different category, not for any fundamental
reason, but simply because it's so outrageously, unjustifiedly
complicated).  Perhaps O'Caml has even *more* to offer there, but
dismissing Ruby & Python as "scripting" languages seems silly to me.
People who write good unit tests (and even, which amazes me, people who
don't) report very significant productivity improvements for applications
of 10k or more when compared with Java and C++.  They certainly don't even
begin to have scaling problems at that point that aren't also present in
Java and C++ (especially when you consider that lines of code are fewer in
these languages than in poor-static-typing languages like Java).


> And they aren't that far from "conventional" languages (think Perl and
> Shell, Python/Ruby and Java).

True in some ways.  That certainly doesn't mean there isn't a very
significant difference in productivity between the two groups, though
("traditional"  and Python / Ruby -- with the caveat that I've never used
Ruby, so can't comment on it).


> Ocaml is more of an applications language- it's benefits start to really
> shine when you're looking at tens of thousands (or more) lines of code.
> C++ succeed (and Objective-C and Smalltalk didn't) because you could write
> C in it.  Java succeeded because IBM, Sun, Oracle, and a number of other
> huge companies got behind it.
[...]


John

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-17 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-13  0:50 Dustin Sallings
2003-11-13  1:18 ` David Fox
2003-11-13  4:09   ` Dustin Sallings
2003-11-14 13:42     ` Damien Doligez
2003-11-14 14:57       ` Christophe Raffalli
2003-11-14 20:24         ` Dmitry Bely
2003-11-14 20:54           ` Eric Dahlman
2003-11-14 22:21             ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-14 21:36               ` John J Lee
2003-11-14 21:48           ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-15  1:47             ` Dmitry Bely
2003-11-15  2:25           ` Max Kirillov
2003-11-15  2:49             ` Mike Furr
2003-11-16  4:09               ` [Caml-list] Bugs from ignoring errors from close (was Re: GC and file..) Tim Freeman
2003-11-15  2:58             ` [Caml-list] GC and file descriptors David Brown
2003-11-17 14:19         ` Damien Doligez
2003-11-17 18:18           ` skaller
2003-11-14 18:35       ` Dustin Sallings
2003-11-15 14:16         ` skaller
2003-11-15 15:56           ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2003-11-15 17:30             ` skaller
2003-11-15 20:31               ` Martin Berger
2003-11-16 19:19               ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-17 18:15                 ` skaller
2003-11-17 19:26                   ` Aleksey Nogin
2003-11-18 13:49                     ` skaller
2003-11-18 17:51                       ` Dustin Sallings
2003-11-18 20:17                       ` Aleksey Nogin
2003-11-20  7:36                         ` Florian Hars
2003-11-17 21:20                   ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-17 23:02                     ` John J Lee [this message]
2003-11-18 12:05                     ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2003-11-18 15:19                       ` skaller
2003-11-18 18:10                         ` John J Lee
2003-11-18 17:55                           ` skaller
2003-11-18 20:02                         ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2003-11-18 21:20                           ` John J Lee
2003-11-19 12:25                           ` skaller
2003-11-19 13:55                             ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2003-11-19 14:26                               ` Samuel Lacas
2003-11-19 14:47                               ` skaller
2003-11-18 15:28                       ` skaller
2003-11-18 18:00                       ` John J Lee
2003-11-18 22:28                       ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-18 23:07                         ` John J Lee
2003-11-18 23:22                         ` Benjamin Geer
2003-11-19  1:49                         ` Martin Berger
2003-11-19  3:57                           ` Dustin Sallings
2003-11-19 13:35                           ` skaller
2003-11-19 13:00                         ` skaller
2003-11-19 13:02                         ` skaller
2003-11-19 17:36                           ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-20  5:14                             ` skaller
2003-11-20  7:37                               ` David Brown
2003-11-18 15:12                     ` skaller
2003-11-18 16:49                       ` Martin Berger
2003-11-18 17:46                         ` skaller
2003-11-19  1:33                           ` Martin Berger
2003-11-19  3:19                             ` Design by Contract, was " Brian Hurt
2003-11-19  2:57                               ` Jacques Carette
2003-11-19 13:27                             ` skaller
2003-11-19 14:41                               ` Martin Berger
2003-11-19 16:54                             ` Richard Jones
2003-11-19 17:18                               ` Damien Doligez
2003-11-19 21:45                                 ` Richard Jones
2003-11-19 23:09                                   ` Benjamin Geer
2003-11-20  0:50                                     ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-11-20  9:42                                       ` Benjamin Geer
2003-11-19 18:03                               ` Martin Berger
2003-11-18 18:26                         ` Benjamin Geer
2003-11-18 19:24                           ` Xavier Leroy
2003-11-18 23:49                             ` Benjamin Geer
2003-11-19  1:36                             ` Martin Berger
2003-11-19  2:28                               ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-11-19  3:26                               ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-19 11:44                                 ` Martin Berger
2003-11-19 17:29                                   ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-20  5:17                                     ` skaller
2003-11-20 16:13                                       ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-19 13:33                               ` skaller
2003-11-19 17:01                                 ` Richard Jones
2003-11-22  2:39                                   ` [Caml-list] AutoMLI (Was: GC and file descriptors) Jim
2003-11-19 17:43                                 ` [Caml-list] GC and file descriptors Brian Hurt
2003-11-20  5:05                                   ` skaller
2003-11-19  1:33                           ` Martin Berger
2003-11-19  2:47                             ` Benjamin Geer
2003-11-18 22:23                       ` Brian Hurt
2003-11-19 13:00                         ` skaller
2003-11-17 22:37                   ` OCaml popularity [was: Re: [Caml-list] GC and file...] John J Lee
2003-11-18  1:02                   ` [Caml-list] Re: GC and file descriptors Jed Davis
2003-11-13  1:19 ` [Caml-list] " Nicolas George
     [not found] ` <87smkstkhg.fsf@igloo.phubuh.org>
     [not found]   ` <347A7A46-1612-11D8-8F93-000393CFE6B8@spy.net>
2003-11-13 20:18     ` Mikael Brockman
     [not found] <20031118232227.GA8437@swordfish>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311182039440.5009-100000@localhost.localdomain>
2003-11-20  6:35   ` Matt Gushee
2003-11-21 16:44     ` skaller
2003-11-21 22:17 Gregory Morrisett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0311172249120.1582@alice \
    --to=jjl@pobox.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).