From: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
To: Benedikt Meurer <benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Linear Scan Register Allocator for ocamlopt/ocamlnat
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:47:39 +0400 (MSD) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1108250046470.8734@linmac> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EF51F29-D437-4F6F-9C91-DBEA3D4C3EB8@googlemail.com>
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2011, at 17:04 , Gabriel Scherer wrote:
>
> > Do you have more precise measurements on
>
> Also posting Marcell's timing results here for reference (taken from bug
> 5324).
>
> > - the performance cost of this new allocator in the generated code? I
> > suppose the results may vary between different architectures (eg. x86
> > is probably more sensitive to good allocation decisions than x86_64).
>
> - http://ps.informatik.uni-siegen.de/~meurer/tmp/compiletime_timings.pdf contains a comparison of the ocamlopt invocations.
> - http://ps.informatik.uni-siegen.de/~meurer/tmp/runtime_timings.pdf contains comparison of the generated code.
>
> As can be seen from the results, amd64 is more sensitive to register
> allocator changes than i386. Not really surprising to me. Would be
> interesting to see how this affects PPC/Sparc/Mips, but we don't have
> appropriate hardware available right now. Anyone with appropriate
> hardware and some spare time? :-)
>
I can test things on PPC/PPC64(well... CBE).
--
mailto:av1474@comtv.ru
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-24 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-01 14:53 Benedikt Meurer
2011-08-01 15:03 ` [Caml-list] " Benedikt Meurer
2011-08-01 15:04 ` [Caml-list] " Gabriel Scherer
2011-08-01 16:57 ` Benedikt Meurer
2011-08-24 19:35 ` Benedikt Meurer
2011-08-24 20:40 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-08-25 8:02 ` Benedikt Meurer
2011-08-25 9:34 ` Benedikt Meurer
2011-08-25 10:21 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-08-25 10:25 ` Pierre-Alexandre Voye
2011-08-26 10:58 ` Guillaume Yziquel
2011-08-26 12:29 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
[not found] ` <CANnJ5GfmnOhk8mJor8PfrGoC1-5vZWOgUKNZMT9k69iu0TBCeA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CANnJ5Gf4AnKPDvrKiYx0joiPbQVOCdFWgPR24Y1ZYYL1Qv5=fg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-08-26 18:33 ` Pierre-Alexandre Voye
2011-08-30 21:07 ` Fermin Reig
2011-08-30 21:21 ` Pierre-Alexandre Voye
2011-08-25 10:43 ` Benedikt Meurer
2011-08-24 20:47 ` malc [this message]
2011-08-26 12:40 ` Roberto Di Cosmo
2011-08-01 15:29 ` Wojciech Meyer
2011-08-01 17:03 ` Benedikt Meurer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1108250046470.8734@linmac \
--to=av1474@comtv.ru \
--cc=benedikt.meurer@googlemail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).