categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes.Huebschmann@math.univ-lille1.fr
To: "Thorsten Altenkirch" <txa@Cs.Nott.AC.UK>,  <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Where does the term monad come from?
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 20:45:33 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1LpLmt-0003MK-3y@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)

From my recollections, the terminology monad was suggested by P. May
as a replacement for triple.
The terminology was intended to match with "operad".
At the time, S. Mac Lane has taken up that suggestion.
In his book "Categories for the working mathematician"
Mac Lane uses the terminology monad and comonad rather than triple
and cotriple.

If Peter May participates in this board I am sure he will react.

Johannes




> A question just came up at the Midland Graduate School (actually in
> the functional programming lecture):
> Where does the word monad come from?
>
> I know that a monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors, but
> what is the logic monoid => monad?
>
> Btw, I frequently encounter monads in a categories of functors which
> are not endofunctors. An example are finite dimensional vectorspaces
> which can be constructed via a monoid in the category of functors
> FinSet -> Set, here I is the embedding and (x) can be constructed from
> the left kan extension and composition.
> The unit is given by the Kronecker delta and join can be constructed
> from Matrix multiplication. Should one call these beasts monads as
> well? Is there a good reference for this type of construction?
>
> Cheers,
> Thorsten
>
>
>





             reply	other threads:[~2009-04-01 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-01 18:45 Johannes.Huebschmann [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-12  1:30 Steve Lack
2009-04-11 15:43 Thorsten Altenkirch
2009-04-07 16:50 Zinovy Diskin
2009-04-07 15:10 jim stasheff
2009-04-07  7:32 Vaughan Pratt
2009-04-07  2:06 RJ Wood
2009-04-06 20:24 John Baez
2009-04-06  4:52 Patrik Eklund
2009-04-03 13:55 burroni
2009-04-03  4:33 Steve Lack
2009-04-03  4:28 Steve Lack
2009-04-02 13:31 jim stasheff
2009-04-01 21:19 burroni
2009-04-01 19:47 Venanzio Capretta
2009-04-01 18:13 Michael Barr
2009-04-01 11:24 Thorsten Altenkirch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1LpLmt-0003MK-3y@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=johannes.huebschmann@math.univ-lille1.fr \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=txa@Cs.Nott.AC.UK \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).