* question on pseudomorphisms
@ 2009-11-23 12:55 burroni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: burroni @ 2009-11-23 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Categories mailing list
Dear all,
Has the following question been already studied and, if it is the case
(it is my opinion), where ?
Let T be a monad on Cat (not necessarily a 2-monad), C the category of
T-algebras and C' the catégorie with the same objets but with
pseudomorphisms (morphisms up to natural isomorphisms --- eventually
with coherences).
The inclusion i : C --> C' has a left adjoint j : C' --> C.
The question is : for all T-algebra A, is the canonical morphisms m :
A --> i(j(A)) an equivalence (of the underlying categories) ?
Regards,
Albert
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: question on pseudomorphisms
[not found] <C7317E69.95F9%s.lack@uws.edu.au>
@ 2009-11-24 19:50 ` burroni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: burroni @ 2009-11-24 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Lack, categories
Dear Steve,
Thank you for your precious informations (I have never read the
article "two-dimensional ...").
But my interest is really in the case of non necessarily 2-monad over
Cat and I am convinced that the adjonction j -| i exists, with or
without coherences (for the pseudomorphisms).
Best regards,
Albert
Steve Lack <s.lack@uws.edu.au> a écrit :
> Dear Albert,
>
> In the case where T is a 2-monad with rank, and the pseudomorphisms are (as
> usual) assumed to be coherent, then this was proved by Blackwell-Kelly-Power
> in the paper 2-dimensional monad theory. (Here "rank" means that the
> 2-functor T preserves alpha-filtered colimit for some alpha - without some
> such assumption, I don't know how you can prove that the left adjoint j
> exists, and I suspect it does not.)
>
> If T has rank but pseudomorphisms are not required to be coherent, then the
> adjoint j will exist, but the morphism A-->ijA need not be an equivalence
> (take the identity monad for example).
>
> If T is not even a 2-monad then I'm not sure what coherence of the 2-cells
> would mean, but in any case there will be problems.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve Lack.
>
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: question on pseudomorphisms
@ 2009-11-24 1:13 Steve Lack
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steve Lack @ 2009-11-24 1:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: burroni, categories
Dear Albert,
In the case where T is a 2-monad with rank, and the pseudomorphisms are (as
usual) assumed to be coherent, then this was proved by Blackwell-Kelly-Power
in the paper 2-dimensional monad theory. (Here "rank" means that the
2-functor T preserves alpha-filtered colimit for some alpha - without some
such assumption, I don't know how you can prove that the left adjoint j
exists, and I suspect it does not.)
If T has rank but pseudomorphisms are not required to be coherent, then the
adjoint j will exist, but the morphism A-->ijA need not be an equivalence
(take the identity monad for example).
If T is not even a 2-monad then I'm not sure what coherence of the 2-cells
would mean, but in any case there will be problems.
Regards,
Steve Lack.
On 23/11/09 11:55 PM, "burroni@math.jussieu.fr" <burroni@math.jussieu.fr>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Has the following question been already studied and, if it is the case
> (it is my opinion), where ?
> Let T be a monad on Cat (not necessarily a 2-monad), C the category of
> T-algebras and C' the catégorie with the same objets but with
> pseudomorphisms (morphisms up to natural isomorphisms --- eventually
> with coherences).
> The inclusion i : C --> C' has a left adjoint j : C' --> C.
>
> The question is : for all T-algebra A, is the canonical morphisms m :
> A --> i(j(A)) an equivalence (of the underlying categories) ?
>
> Regards,
> Albert
>
>
>
> [For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-24 19:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-23 12:55 question on pseudomorphisms burroni
2009-11-24 1:13 Steve Lack
[not found] <C7317E69.95F9%s.lack@uws.edu.au>
2009-11-24 19:50 ` burroni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).