* The notion of "model of a category"
@ 2010-01-15 10:44 Hans-Peter Stricker
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Hans-Peter Stricker @ 2010-01-15 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: categories
In category theory texts categories are referred to by terms like
a) "let C be a category with such-and-such (inner) properties"
b) "the category of [some object type + morphisms, e.g. groups or
topological spaces]" (always (?) concrete categories) and
c) "[some structure, e.g. a poset, a group] treated as a category" (mostly
(?) abstract categories)
What I wonder about is if and how a category C can be explicitly given
without referring to a "standard model" as in b) (according to model theory
where a theory is firstly given and models are searched for only after
that). I.e. I was looking for the term "let C be *the* category with
such-and-such (inner) properties" but didn't find it.
If this can be achieved, the search for "models" seems natural, but what's
the common name for a "model of a category"? Google knows little about
"model of a category": 5 hits in conjunction with "category theory", 8 hits
in conjunction with "morphism", 7 hits in conjunction with "functor".
Thanks in advance!
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-01-15 10:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-15 10:44 The notion of "model of a category" Hans-Peter Stricker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).