* A well known result
@ 2011-01-14 1:24 JeanBenabou
[not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.00.1101141747190.9206@siskin.dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: JeanBenabou @ 2011-01-14 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Prof. Peter Johnstone, Categories
Dear Peter,
In one of my mails I mentioned the following result, which I thought
to be original:
Proposition: Let P: X --> S be a fibration. The functor P is final
iff all its fibers are connected
From your answer to that mail, dated December 29, I quote:
"please don't deceive yourself that this is a new result. It is a (very)
special case of the theorem of Street and Walters ("The comprehensive
factorization of a functor", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 79, 1973) that the
pair (final functors, discrete fibrations) forms a factorization
structure
on Cat. It's true that this result is not stated in the Elephant (why on
earth should it be?), but the Street--Walters factorization (for
internal
categories) is treated in section B2.5."
I tried to prove that my proposition was a consequence of the theorem
of Street-Walters which you quoted in you mail, but did not succeed.
Then I consulted their original paper, hoping to find there more
details which would help me to find a proof. Again in vain.
I'm quite sure that you're right, and that my inability to get a
proof is entirely due to my mathematical limitations.
Thus I'd really be very grateful, if you'd give me a proof, or even a
sketch of a proof, that my proposition is an easy consequence of the
theorem of Street and Walters.
Many thanks in advance and best regards,
Jean
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: A well known result
[not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.00.1101141747190.9206@siskin.dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
@ 2011-01-14 19:56 ` JeanBenabou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: JeanBenabou @ 2011-01-14 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Prof. Peter Johnstone, Categories
Dear Peter,
I stand corrected. My proposition is indeed an immediate consequence
of Street and Walters. It is also a consequence of much more general
results of mine on foliated categories which I didn't mention, and I
didn't realize that this special case was easy. This is no excuse. I
was careless, and have to "pay" for this carelessness. this is why I
make my answer public although your mail was addressed only to me.
There are many mathematical questions I asked you, which you didn't
answer. I hope this mail will incite you to answer some of them.
Best regards,
Jean
Le 14 janv. 11 à 18:54, Prof. Peter Johnstone a écrit :
> Dear Jean,
>
> The derivation seems simple enough to me. Street and Walters showed
> that
> a functor is final iff it is orthogonal to the class of discrete
> fibrations. In particular this applies to fibrations which are final
> functors; but any fibration admits a factorization through the
> discrete fibration whose fibres are the connected components of
> the original fibres. Hence, if a fibration is orthogonal to discrete
> fibrations, its fibres must be connected. The converse is similar.
>
> Best regards,
> Peter
>
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, JeanBenabou wrote:
>
>> Dear Peter,
>>
>> In one of my mails I mentioned the following result, which I
>> thought to be original:
>>
>> Proposition: Let P: X --> S be a fibration. The functor P is final
>> iff all its fibers are connected
>>
>> From your answer to that mail, dated December 29, I quote:
>>
>> "please don't deceive yourself that this is a new result. It is a
>> (very)
>> special case of the theorem of Street and Walters ("The comprehensive
>> factorization of a functor", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 79, 1973) that
>> the
>> pair (final functors, discrete fibrations) forms a factorization
>> structure
>> on Cat. It's true that this result is not stated in the Elephant
>> (why on
>> earth should it be?), but the Street--Walters factorization (for
>> internal
>> categories) is treated in section B2.5."
>>
>> I tried to prove that my proposition was a consequence of the
>> theorem of Street-Walters which you quoted in you mail, but did
>> not succeed. Then I consulted their original paper, hoping to find
>> there more details which would help me to find a proof. Again in
>> vain.
>>
>> I'm quite sure that you're right, and that my inability to get a
>> proof is entirely due to my mathematical limitations.
>>
>> Thus I'd really be very grateful, if you'd give me a proof, or
>> even a sketch of a proof, that my proposition is an easy
>> consequence of the theorem of Street and Walters.
>>
>> Many thanks in advance and best regards,
>> Jean
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-14 19:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-14 1:24 A well known result JeanBenabou
[not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.00.1101141747190.9206@siskin.dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
2011-01-14 19:56 ` JeanBenabou
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).