From: Jamie Vicary <jamie.vicary@cs.ox.ac.uk>
To: Categories list <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Homotopy hypothesis for contractible operad definitions of weak n-categories
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:21:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1dVGrV-0002aF-Qu@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
Hi,
Batanin, Leinster and other have presented related definitions of weak
n-groupoid in terms of contractible globular operads. I personally find
these definitions of "contractible n-groupoids" extremely beautiful. I am
interested to learn what evidence we have that the homotopy hypothesis
might be true for (at least one of) these definitions.
Some good evidence is provided by Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine's [1] proof that a
homotopy type gives rise to an infinity-groupoid in the sense of Leinster.
There is other work along similar lines. But, as far as I am aware, it
remains possible that contractible n-groupoids might in general be weaker
structures than homotopy n-types.
A fun way to investigate this would be to verify small instances of
phenomena associated to the periodic table in contractible n-groupoids. For
example, Christoph Dorn has shown me a proof that the Eckmann-Hilton
argument holds in a Leinster 2-category; that is, for an object X, and for
2-morphisms f,g:id[X]-->id[X], we have f.g=g.f, thereby establishing one of
the first phenomena predicted by the periodic table.
Have any higher phenomena from the periodic table been verified? Or, is
there other evidence that contractible n-groupoids behave "homotopically"
in general?
Best wishes,
Jamie
[1]
http://peterlefanulumsdaine.com/research/Lumsdaine-Weak-omega-cats-from-ITT-LMCS.pdf
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next reply other threads:[~2017-07-11 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-11 21:21 Jamie Vicary [this message]
2017-07-12 13:12 ` henry
2017-07-13 22:19 Camell Kachour
2017-07-15 6:35 ` Timothy Porter
2017-07-15 20:59 RONALD BROWN
[not found] <26365428.34049.1500152389075.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost>
2017-07-16 5:53 ` Timothy Porter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1dVGrV-0002aF-Qu@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=jamie.vicary@cs.ox.ac.uk \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).