* SpamAssassin support added
@ 2004-01-21 1:04 Ted Zlatanov
2004-01-21 12:00 ` Steinar Bang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2004-01-21 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
Thanks to Hubert Chan, SA is now supported as a separate backend. I
comitted his patch to CVS. Thank you!
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: SpamAssassin support added
2004-01-21 1:04 SpamAssassin support added Ted Zlatanov
@ 2004-01-21 12:00 ` Steinar Bang
2004-01-21 15:05 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steinar Bang @ 2004-01-21 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>:
> Thanks to Hubert Chan, SA is now supported as a separate backend. I
> comitted his patch to CVS. Thank you!
What's in this patch? Can it report to SpamAssassin's bayesian
filter, via email? Or does it just support SpamAssassin running
locally?
Thanx!
- Steinar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: SpamAssassin support added
2004-01-21 12:00 ` Steinar Bang
@ 2004-01-21 15:05 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-01-21 20:12 ` Steinar Bang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2004-01-21 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, sb@dod.no wrote:
>>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>:
>
>> Thanks to Hubert Chan, SA is now supported as a separate backend.
>> I comitted his patch to CVS. Thank you!
>
> What's in this patch?
See the ChangeLog. Basically spam-use-spamassassin,
spam-use-spamassassin-headers, and all the related support functions
and variables. You can customize the spam-spamassassin variable
group.
> Can it report to SpamAssassin's bayesian filter, via email? Or does
> it just support SpamAssassin running locally?
I think you can use spamc instead of sa-learn. Hubert said it's
possible in the doc string for the SA executable. I have not done it,
so I can't verify.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: SpamAssassin support added
2004-01-21 15:05 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2004-01-21 20:12 ` Steinar Bang
2004-01-21 23:20 ` John Owens
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steinar Bang @ 2004-01-21 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>:
>> Can it report to SpamAssassin's bayesian filter, via email? Or
>> does it just support SpamAssassin running locally?
> I think you can use spamc instead of sa-learn. Hubert said it's
> possible in the doc string for the SA executable. I have not done
> it, so I can't verify.
Hm... from the doc string, it looks like spamc is something that
communicates with a spamd? What I would like to do, is to do a resend
of the email to an email address.
Is this possible?
Thanx!
- Steinar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: SpamAssassin support added
2004-01-21 20:12 ` Steinar Bang
@ 2004-01-21 23:20 ` John Owens
2004-01-22 18:27 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: John Owens @ 2004-01-21 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:
> Hm... from the doc string, it looks like spamc is something that
> communicates with a spamd? What I would like to do, is to do a resend
> of the email to an email address.
I second this - I reach inside the SpamAssassin-wrapped message to
pull out the original message and then send it to spamcop and
uce@ftc.gov. Spamcop, at least, is happy with a message from me; the
contents of the message are simply the whole spam message including
headers.
JDO
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: SpamAssassin support added
2004-01-21 23:20 ` John Owens
@ 2004-01-22 18:27 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-01-22 22:22 ` John Owens
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2004-01-22 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, jowens@ucdavis.edu wrote:
> Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:
>
>> Hm... from the doc string, it looks like spamc is something that
>> communicates with a spamd? What I would like to do, is to do a
>> resend of the email to an email address.
>
> I second this - I reach inside the SpamAssassin-wrapped message to
> pull out the original message and then send it to spamcop and
> uce@ftc.gov. Spamcop, at least, is happy with a message from me; the
> contents of the message are simply the whole spam message including
> headers.
I think you want something like the Gmane support in spam-report.el.
I don't use the SA wrapping myself, so I haven't had this problem.
Maybe it should be automatically detected by the spam-report function
and the message should be unwrapped before sending to an address.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: SpamAssassin support added
2004-01-22 18:27 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2004-01-22 22:22 ` John Owens
2004-01-23 21:01 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: John Owens @ 2004-01-22 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: John Owens, ding
Ted Zlatanov writes:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, jowens@ucdavis.edu wrote:
> I second this - I reach inside the SpamAssassin-wrapped message to
> pull out the original message and then send it to spamcop and
> uce@ftc.gov. Spamcop, at least, is happy with a message from me; the
> contents of the message are simply the whole spam message including
> headers.
I think you want something like the Gmane support in spam-report.el.
I'll take a look.
I don't use the SA wrapping myself, so I haven't had this problem.
Maybe it should be automatically detected by the spam-report function
and the message should be unwrapped before sending to an address.
I think it's a fairly common situation that people don't have control
over what happens upstream - mine get wrapped by another mail server
that I don't have access to and then forwarded to me.
I think I actually prefer the wrapping, since then I get the virgin
message without any SpamAssassin-applied additional headers. Thus if
spam-report.el unwrapped it for me and could send it along, that would
be ideal.
JDO
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: SpamAssassin support added
2004-01-22 22:22 ` John Owens
@ 2004-01-23 21:01 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2004-01-23 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: John Owens, ding
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, jowens@ece.ucdavis.edu wrote:
> I think I actually prefer the wrapping, since then I get the virgin
> message without any SpamAssassin-applied additional headers. Thus if
> spam-report.el unwrapped it for me and could send it along, that
> would be ideal.
I agree. If you or someone else want to write the functionality
(closely related to what Andy Cohen and Jesper Harder are doing with
spam-wash.el) that would be great, and I'll put it into
spam-report.el. Otherwise, I'll put it on my list for when I have
the time :)
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-23 21:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-21 1:04 SpamAssassin support added Ted Zlatanov
2004-01-21 12:00 ` Steinar Bang
2004-01-21 15:05 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-01-21 20:12 ` Steinar Bang
2004-01-21 23:20 ` John Owens
2004-01-22 18:27 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-01-22 22:22 ` John Owens
2004-01-23 21:01 ` Ted Zlatanov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).