Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Agent vs unplugged
@ 2003-05-01 18:33 Jaap-Henk Hoepman
  2003-05-01 19:32 ` Kai Großjohann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jaap-Henk Hoepman @ 2003-05-01 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)



It seems to me that, strictly speaking, the "Agent" and the "unplugged"
mechanism are two separate things. In fact, i thought i had been using the
agent for ages, while in fact i was only using the unplugged mechanism - i use
gnus almost exclusively for reading mail. I found out by browsing the new info
files for ognus reading: 

   * Decide which servers should be covered by the Agent.  If you have a
     mail back end, it would probably be nonsensical to have it covered
     by the Agent.  

Is it possible to use gnus in unplugged mode while not agentizing gnus (i still
do (gnus-agentize) in .gnus.el, but according to the docs that's no longer
necessary...)?

Currently, unpluggedness is presented as one of the features of the agent. 
I think the agent and unpluggedness should be treated seperately.
The reason why is the following:
- unpluggedness is an easy concept, that most people are bound to use:
  Being unplugged means that no checks for new mail or news are made, that
  outgoing messages end up in the queue (instead of being sent straight away),
  and that only locally available messages (i.e. mail in nnml etc or cached
  news (see agent)) can be read. 
- the agent is a much more difficult subject, that appears to be useful only
  for news (and possibly imap), and that allows you to read news messages while
  unplugged, or to keep messages locally that might otherwise ne expired by the
  news server.

Does this make sense to anybody else?

Jaap-Henk

-- 
Jaap-Henk Hoepman           |  I've got sunshine in my pockets
Dept. of Computer Science   |  Brought it back to spray the day
University of Nijmegen      |        Gry "Rocket"
(w) www.cs.kun.nl/~jhh      |  (m) jhh@cs.kun.nl
(t) +31 24 36 52710/531532  |  (f) +31 24 3653137




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Agent vs unplugged
  2003-05-01 18:33 Agent vs unplugged Jaap-Henk Hoepman
@ 2003-05-01 19:32 ` Kai Großjohann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2003-05-01 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)


Jaap-Henk Hoepman <jhh@cs.kun.nl> writes:

> It seems to me that, strictly speaking, the "Agent" and the
> "unplugged" mechanism are two separate things.

Not really, IMHO.

The Agent supports different functionalities: (a) toggle between
plugged and unplugged mode, (b) fetch messages into the `agent cache'
(only when plugged, of course), and (c) allow people to read messages
from the agent cache.  (There's also (d) queue messages while
unplugged, and (e) send queued messages.)

What's the point of (a) alone?

What's the point of being unplugged if the agent cache is empty?  You
can't read any messages then.

-- 
file-error; Data: (Opening input file no such file or directory ~/.signature)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-01 19:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-01 18:33 Agent vs unplugged Jaap-Henk Hoepman
2003-05-01 19:32 ` Kai Großjohann

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).