* unnecessary scanning of nnml groups
@ 2016-09-05 10:29 Peter Münster
2016-09-05 23:21 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Münster @ 2016-09-05 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Hi,
When calling gnus-group-get-new-news with gnus-activate-level = 2, then
all my nnml groups with level 7 are scanned too. It takes some time, and
for every group I get this message:
Reading incoming mail from directory...
nnml: Reading incoming mail (no new mail)...done
How could I please prevent this unnecessary scanning of all nnml groups?
TIA for any hints,
--
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: unnecessary scanning of nnml groups
2016-09-05 10:29 unnecessary scanning of nnml groups Peter Münster
@ 2016-09-05 23:21 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2016-09-06 5:17 ` Peter Münster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Katsumi Yamaoka @ 2016-09-05 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
On Mon, 05 Sep 2016 12:29:31 +0200, Peter Münster wrote:
> When calling gnus-group-get-new-news with gnus-activate-level = 2, then
> all my nnml groups with level 7 are scanned too. It takes some time, and
> for every group I get this message:
> Reading incoming mail from directory...
> nnml: Reading incoming mail (no new mail)...done
I tried setting the group level of my all the nnml groups to 7,
and performing `2 g' without modifying gnus-activate-level, and
`g' with modifying gnus-activate-level to 2, but I saw scanning
those groups didn't happen. I also looked into the
gnus-get-unread-articles code but couldn't find no odd one. Hmm.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: unnecessary scanning of nnml groups
2016-09-05 23:21 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
@ 2016-09-06 5:17 ` Peter Münster
2016-09-06 6:15 ` Peter Münster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Münster @ 2016-09-06 5:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
On Tue, Sep 06 2016, Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
> I tried setting the group level of my all the nnml groups to 7,
> and performing `2 g' without modifying gnus-activate-level, and
> `g' with modifying gnus-activate-level to 2, but I saw scanning
> those groups didn't happen. I also looked into the
> gnus-get-unread-articles code but couldn't find no odd one. Hmm.
Sorry, I think, that this setting might be important too:
(setq mail-sources '((file) (directory :path "~/.mail")))
--
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: unnecessary scanning of nnml groups
2016-09-06 5:17 ` Peter Münster
@ 2016-09-06 6:15 ` Peter Münster
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Münster @ 2016-09-06 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
On Tue, Sep 06 2016, Peter Münster wrote:
> Sorry, I think, that this setting might be important too:
>
> (setq mail-sources '((file) (directory :path "~/.mail")))
And now, I've found the solution:
(setq nnmail-scan-directory-mail-source-once t)
Sorry for the noise,
--
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-06 6:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-05 10:29 unnecessary scanning of nnml groups Peter Münster
2016-09-05 23:21 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2016-09-06 5:17 ` Peter Münster
2016-09-06 6:15 ` Peter Münster
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).