Going to next unseen article?

Going to next unseen article?

[Michael Heerdegen]

Hi,

seems there is no summary command to go to the next unseen article.  Or
did I miss it, or can this be done in some way I missed?  The only thing I
found is / . (`gnus-summary-limit-to-unseen').

Something like `gnus-summary-next-unseen-article' would be useful for
people like me who tend to have a lot of older unread articles but only
want to check the unseen ones.  Seems gnus-sum.el is not really prepared
for the task however.

Opinions?


TIA,

Michael.

Re: Going to next unseen article?

[Clemens Schüller]

Hello!

On 08. Apr. 2019, Michael Heerdegen wrote:

> Hi,
>
> seems there is no summary command to go to the next unseen article.  Or
> did I miss it, or can this be done in some way I missed?  The only thing I
> found is / . (`gnus-summary-limit-to-unseen').
>
> Something like `gnus-summary-next-unseen-article' would be useful for
> people like me who tend to have a lot of older unread articles but only
> want to check the unseen ones.  Seems gnus-sum.el is not really prepared
> for the task however.
>
> Opinions?

Maybe this could be the right solution for you :-)

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
n runs the command gnus-summary-next-unread-article (found in
gnus-summary-mode-map), which is an interactive compiled Lisp function
in ‘gnus-sum.el’.

It is bound to n, G n, <menu-bar> <Gnus> <Move> <Next unread article>.

(gnus-summary-next-unread-article)

Select unread article after current one.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---


-- 
Best Regards, Clemens Schüller

Re: Going to next unseen article?

[Eric S Fraga]

On Monday,  8 Apr 2019 at 17:23, Clemens Schüller wrote:
> Maybe this could be the right solution for you :-)

Unfortunately, no; the OP does not want the next unread but the next
unseen instead (ones with . in the summary line).

-- 
Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50 & org 9.2.3 on Debian buster/sid

Re: Going to next unseen article?

[Michael Heerdegen]

Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:

> Unfortunately, no; the OP does not want the next unread but the next
> unseen instead (ones with . in the summary line).

Yes, exactly.

Ok, I filed a report to "The Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys", it's now
Bug#35213.  How many girls are among these, btw?


Michael.