Last message in thread in summary buffer

Last message in thread in summary buffer

[Sacha Chua]

Gnus is wonderful. Gnus is good. =)

I need help figuring out how to do this tricky thing with Gnus. I
frequently want to see messages that I haven't replied to. Right now,
I tick stuff I still need to reply to, then untick and mark as read
when I'm done. It works, but it's a bit tedious.

I thought about scoring up messages to me and scoring down messages
from me. This will result in a positive thread score for messages I
still have to reply to. However, my keyword and adaptive scoring will
throw this a bit off.

I thought about defining something that would hide threads, but I'm
interested in keeping the subtrees and hiding the roots.

I probably don't understand limits that well - "A" doesn't seem to
work. C-u / m shift-A RET in the summary buffer _should_ get me a list
of unanswered articles, right? (I'll remove those by me afterwards.)

Hmmm...

Is there a neat way to see perhaps just the last message of each
thread, or highlight messages that haven't been replied to?

-- 
Sacha Chua <sacha@free.net.ph> - Ateneo CS faculty geekette
interests: emacs, gnu/linux, making computer science education fun
http://sacha.free.net.ph/

Re: Last message in thread in summary buffer

[Nevin Kapur]

Sacha Chua <sacha@free.net.ph> writes:

> Right now,
> I tick stuff I still need to reply to, then untick and mark as read
> when I'm done. It works, but it's a bit tedious.

I do the same thing.  It would be cool if Gnus had a mark called
Follow-Up or something that one could set.  It would behave just like
tick except that once an article has been replied to, the mark would
disappear. 

-Nevin

Re: Last message in thread in summary buffer

[Robert Epprecht]

Nevin Kapur <nkapur@cs.caltech.edu> writes:

> It would be cool if Gnus had a mark called
> Follow-Up or something that one could set.  It would behave just like
> tick except that once an article has been replied to, the mark would
> disappear. 

Or even better, if the user could define his own marks...

Robert Epprecht