Re: Once again: PGnus & PGP

[Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

* Jack Twilley <jmt+usenet@nycap.rr.com>  on Sun, 11 Apr 1999
| Hee.  If someone didn't know you, they might call you an elitist or
| something.[1]

I *AM* an elitist.  Or something. :)

| Okay.  So if the MIME blocks are analogous to files, why couldn't
| mailcrypt simply take the "application/pgp-signature" and apply it to
| the previous attachment, whatever it is?  Would that work?  I'm going
| to test it on Carey's message, by hand.

It would.  At least it should.  The problem here is that current versions
of PGP does not properly adhere to PGP standards.  GnuPG might serve you
better in this regard.  Dunnow for sure.

| Indeed.  However, there are greater and lesser forms of Evil.  I'm
| seeing X-Pgp as being Broken Evil, and this PGP/MIME as simply Stupid
| Evil.

I concour.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v0.9.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE3EjLIgl+vIlSVSNkRAr7GAKCuXflfeMjQRXC/jphm4tFrK5XcYwCgnnBO
b4sHYtHDz5oQJIEpVJiKYaY=
=UfFJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>    \ Happy Fun Ball contains a liquid core,
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ which, if exposed due to rupture, should
PGP Key: at a key server near you!  \ not be touched, inhaled, or looked at.