* How to run with no `marks' code at all
@ 2001-09-04 1:37 Harry Putnam
2001-09-04 7:10 ` Paul Jarc
2001-09-04 8:14 ` Simon Josefsson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Harry Putnam @ 2001-09-04 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
I've had about enough of the problems associated with the new marks
code, or maybe its some other new code, but I see a continuous problem
in one nnml group that I use for a prescan group. Not the ordinary
usage to be sure but has been working until `marks' made there debut.
The prescan group slurps a procmail spoolfile that contains all new
mail at each fetch. Once I scan it there, I respool it with my split
rules so that group is always left empty after a respool.
Here lately I find already respooled messages still in there only not
really, the files are gone but .overview or newsrc.eld still sees
them.
Usually have to generate nov after destroying .overview .marks. I
never saw this kind of thing prior to `marks'
Also it seems that a `g' command now takes quite a lot longer than
before.
So to get to the punch line: How can I disable all marks related
stuff in order to see if that is the culprit? Or maybe just retreat
to an earlier gnus. Not really sure how to checkout a specific
version or which one to try for even.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: How to run with no `marks' code at all
2001-09-04 1:37 How to run with no `marks' code at all Harry Putnam
@ 2001-09-04 7:10 ` Paul Jarc
2001-09-04 8:14 ` Simon Josefsson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Jarc @ 2001-09-04 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> wrote:
> Here lately I find already respooled messages still in there only not
> really, the files are gone but .overview or newsrc.eld still sees
> them.
You might try nnmaildir. :) No such behavior here, AFAIK.
> How can I disable all marks related stuff in order to see if that is
> the culprit?
Set nnml-marks-is-evil to t in your server parameters.
paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: How to run with no `marks' code at all
2001-09-04 1:37 How to run with no `marks' code at all Harry Putnam
2001-09-04 7:10 ` Paul Jarc
@ 2001-09-04 8:14 ` Simon Josefsson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Josefsson @ 2001-09-04 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Harry Putnam wrote:
> The prescan group slurps a procmail spoolfile that contains all new
> mail at each fetch. Once I scan it there, I respool it with my split
> rules so that group is always left empty after a respool.
>
> Here lately I find already respooled messages still in there only not
> really, the files are gone but .overview or newsrc.eld still sees
> them.
How does your respooling setup look like? Is the respooling commands
invoked in the prescan summary buffer? What does *Messages* contain after
you have done all this?
> Also it seems that a `g' command now takes quite a lot longer than
> before.
Yes. I guess I'll add the obvious speedup now, and track down other
possible optimizations later. Details about which functions are slow are
helpful here.
> So to get to the punch line: How can I disable all marks related
> stuff in order to see if that is the culprit?
Put (nnml-marks-is-evil t) as a server parameter.
> Or maybe just retreat to an earlier gnus. Not really sure how to
> checkout a specific version or which one to try for even.
`cvs update -D FOO' or `cvs update -r BAR' should work, where FOO being a
date (search in the ChangeLog for `marks' or something), BAR being a CVS
tag.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-09-04 8:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-09-04 1:37 How to run with no `marks' code at all Harry Putnam
2001-09-04 7:10 ` Paul Jarc
2001-09-04 8:14 ` Simon Josefsson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).