Saving revised run-at-time? (was Re: CVS update of gnus/lisp)

Saving revised run-at-time? (was Re: CVS update of gnus/lisp)

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

>>>>> In <E1AdsxF-0004Mi-00@quimby.gnus.org>
>>>>>	"Steve Youngs" <youngs@xemacs.org> wrote:

>     Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2004 @ 16:17:13
>   Author: cvs
>     Path: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/lisp

> Modified: ChangeLog dgnushack.el run-at-time.el

> 2004-01-07  Steve Youngs  <sryoungs@bigpond.net.au>

> 	* run-at-time.el (run-at-time-saved): Move to after the definition
> 	of `run-at-time'.

What do you want to save?  It was probably intended to save the
original function provided by fsf-compat.  If it is for avoiding
errors, you should put the following in the beginning of the
file:

(defvar run-at-time-saved (when (fboundp 'run-at-time)
			    (symbol-function 'run-at-time)))
-- 
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>

Re: Saving revised run-at-time?

[Steve Youngs]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 956 bytes --]

|--==> "KY" == Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:

  >>>>>>In <E1AdsxF-0004Mi-00@quimby.gnus.org>
  >>>>>>"Steve Youngs" <youngs@xemacs.org> wrote:

  >>Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2004 @ 16:17:13
  >>Author: cvs
  >>Path: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/lisp

  >>Modified: ChangeLog dgnushack.el run-at-time.el

  >>2004-01-07  Steve Youngs  <sryoungs@bigpond.net.au>

  >>* run-at-time.el (run-at-time-saved): Move to after the definition
  >>of `run-at-time'.

  KY> What do you want to save?

I have absolutely no idea.  I thought about just removing
`run-at-time-saved' altogether, but I didn't know if you or Lars had
plans for it.

If it isn't going to be used, why don't we just delete the variable. 

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
|              Ashes to ashes, dust to dust.               |
|      The proof of the pudding, is under the crust.       |
|------------------------------<sryoungs@bigpond.net.au>---|

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]

Re: Saving revised run-at-time?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Steve Youngs <sryoungs@bigpond.net.au> writes:

> I have absolutely no idea.  I thought about just removing
> `run-at-time-saved' altogether, but I didn't know if you or Lars had
> plans for it.

I wrote the -saved thing before actually reading the code -- I
thought it was used.  But it isn't, so I'll remove it...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: Saving revised run-at-time?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> I wrote the -saved thing before actually reading the code -- I
> thought it was used.  But it isn't, so I'll remove it...

Oops.  Too late.  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: Saving revised run-at-time?

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

>>>>> In <m3d69wh566.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
>>>>>	Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:

> Steve Youngs <sryoungs@bigpond.net.au> writes:

>> I have absolutely no idea.  I thought about just removing
>> `run-at-time-saved' altogether, but I didn't know if you or Lars had
>> plans for it.

> I wrote the -saved thing before actually reading the code -- I
> thought it was used.  But it isn't, so I'll remove it...

Sorry, I've already done.
-- 
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>