no indication that bootstrapping marks has completed

no indication that bootstrapping marks has completed

[David Edmondson]

It's a small thing, but bootstrapping marks doesn't indicate that it's
finished.  Small proposal appended (untested yet).

--- nnml.el.~6.36.~	Tue Jan 29 16:03:43 2002
+++ nnml.el	Mon Feb  4 14:47:03 2002
@@ -1011,7 +1011,8 @@
 	(push (cons 'read (gnus-info-read info)) nnml-marks)
 	(dolist (el gnus-article-unpropagated-mark-lists)
 	  (setq nnml-marks (gnus-remassoc el nnml-marks)))
-	(nnml-save-marks group server)))))
+	(nnml-save-marks group server)
+	(nnheader-message 7 "Bootstrapping marks for %s...done." group)))))
 
 (provide 'nnml)
 
--- nnfolder.el.~6.35.~	Thu Jan 31 10:41:28 2002
+++ nnfolder.el	Mon Feb  4 14:47:59 2002
@@ -1232,7 +1232,8 @@
 	(push (cons 'read (gnus-info-read info)) nnfolder-marks)
 	(dolist (el gnus-article-unpropagated-mark-lists)
 	  (setq nnfolder-marks (gnus-remassoc el nnfolder-marks)))
-	(nnfolder-save-marks group server)))))
+	(nnfolder-save-marks group server)
+	(nnheader-message 7 "Bootstrapping marks for %s..." group)))))
 
 (provide 'nnfolder)
 

Re: no indication that bootstrapping marks has completed

[Simon Josefsson]

David Edmondson <dme@sun.com> writes:

> It's a small thing, but bootstrapping marks doesn't indicate that it's
> finished.  Small proposal appended (untested yet).

Committed.  (I don't think you are supposed to end these strings with
"...done." but rather "...done", and the second patch of yours didn't
include "done" at all, so I modified it slightly.)