Re: Verifying GPGP signed messages: mailcrypt bug or Gnus configuration problem?

[Jorge Godoy <godoy@conectiva.com>]

On 21 Nov 2000, zsh@cs.rochester.edu wrote:
> Jorge Godoy <godoy@conectiva.com> writes:
> 
>> How can I see the full message without any post-processing
>> (i.e. beautification after receiving the message) from Gnus? I want
>> to cut the message, cut the signature and try running gpg by hand.
> 
> C-u g


Thanks! 


I've seen the message and there are the codes I thought there would
be, e.g., 

,----
| =C9, sim. N=E3o tem word-wrapping ou coisa parecida ligada a=ED?
| Estou assinando de novo.
`----

instead of

,----
| É, sim. Não tem word-wrapping ou coisa parecida ligada aí?
| Estou assinando de novo.
`----


I think this is because there's no description of what encoding to use
for the body on the headers. These are the relevant parts of it:

,----
| Mime-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
|         protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ"
| Content-Disposition: inline
| User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
`----

(I've inserted that elisp to change the mutt signature from MD5 to
SHA1, but this didn't help)


Is there any way to tell Gnus to always use ISO-8859-1 for messages it
don't receive any other encoding instruction?



Thanks!
-- 
Godoy. <godoy@conectiva.com>

Departamento de Publicações       Conectiva S.A.
Publishing Department             Conectiva Inc.