* [PATCH] Expiry-target for nnmh
@ 2000-11-23 10:07 janneke
2000-11-23 15:21 ` Kai Großjohann
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: janneke @ 2000-11-23 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
My first patch to Gnus implements expiry-target for the nnmh backend.
http://appel.lilypond.org/software/gnus-5.8.7.jcn1.diff
Is expiry-target widely used? I'm new to Gnus; and sometimes a bit
confused about what one would actually use. The auto-expiry feature
of read articles looks very promising, but it's not exactly what I
want. Before, using plain mh and scripts, I used to move only mail
that I had answered semi-automatically to my archives, so that my
read-but-unanswered-messages would stay in my inboxes for
manual-archiving. Can this be easily automated with Gnus?
While this was fine for personal mail, it was maybe not the perfect
solution for mailinglist-mail (answering bug-reports). With Gnus, it
would be possible to improve on this, by auto-expiring only mail that
has been read, and of which the tread is longer than 1. This way,
unanswered bug reports/help requests won't expire untill they're
answered by someone. How do you handle this, or does this require
some more hacking?
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Expiry-target for nnmh
2000-11-23 10:07 [PATCH] Expiry-target for nnmh janneke
@ 2000-11-23 15:21 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-11-30 1:50 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-30 19:40 ` Feature request: "Security" feature Raja R Harinath
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kai Großjohann @ 2000-11-23 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
I suspect that most people use `!' (ticked) or `?' (dormant) to mark
messages where something still needs to be done.
I used to have a group where I received a LOT of mail, there I would
do a manual moving of old articles every month or so. This way, most
of the old mail that I was needing currently could be accessed easily.
Also, it helps to not use total-expire. Then, entering a group
doesn't need to display as many messages. Fetching headers is fairly fast.
kai
--
The arms should be held in a natural and unaffected way and never
be conspicuous. -- Revised Technique of Latin American Dancing
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Expiry-target for nnmh
2000-11-23 10:07 [PATCH] Expiry-target for nnmh janneke
2000-11-23 15:21 ` Kai Großjohann
@ 2000-11-30 1:50 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-30 19:40 ` Feature request: "Security" feature Raja R Harinath
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ShengHuo ZHU @ 2000-11-30 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
janneke@gnu.org writes:
> Hi,
>
> My first patch to Gnus implements expiry-target for the nnmh backend.
>
> http://appel.lilypond.org/software/gnus-5.8.7.jcn1.diff
I've installed the patch and changed a little.
ShengHuo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Feature request: "Security" feature
2000-11-23 10:07 [PATCH] Expiry-target for nnmh janneke
2000-11-23 15:21 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-11-30 1:50 ` ShengHuo ZHU
@ 2000-11-30 19:40 ` Raja R Harinath
2000-12-01 1:28 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-12-01 3:06 ` Kevin A. Burton
2 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Raja R Harinath @ 2000-11-30 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
It would be nice if the buttons, introduced in the article buffer by
the "gnus-*-verify-*" functions, had some useful action -- like
showing the output of the underlying program.
Say, you have the button
[[PGP Verified: OK]]
Clicking on it would produce:
[[PGP Verified: OK]
Good Signature from: John Q. Signer <jqs@foo.com>
No trust path established.
]
If we don't pay attention to the status bar while it's verifying, we
lose this information (looking at *Messages* is more painful than
clicking a button in the article).
- Hari
--
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu
"When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Feature request: "Security" feature
2000-11-30 19:40 ` Feature request: "Security" feature Raja R Harinath
@ 2000-12-01 1:28 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-12-01 3:06 ` Michael Welsh Duggan
2000-12-01 3:06 ` Kevin A. Burton
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: ShengHuo ZHU @ 2000-12-01 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
Raja R Harinath <harinath@cs.umn.edu> writes:
> Hi,
>
> It would be nice if the buttons, introduced in the article buffer by
> the "gnus-*-verify-*" functions, had some useful action -- like
> showing the output of the underlying program.
>
> Say, you have the button
>
> [[PGP Verified: OK]]
>
> Clicking on it would produce:
>
> [[PGP Verified: OK]
> Good Signature from: John Q. Signer <jqs@foo.com>
> No trust path established.
> ]
>
> If we don't pay attention to the status bar while it's verifying, we
> lose this information (looking at *Messages* is more painful than
> clicking a button in the article).
The problem is how to capture those messages from mailcrypt or gpg.el.
Anyone knows?
ShengHuo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Feature request: "Security" feature
2000-11-30 19:40 ` Feature request: "Security" feature Raja R Harinath
2000-12-01 1:28 ` ShengHuo ZHU
@ 2000-12-01 3:06 ` Kevin A. Burton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kevin A. Burton @ 2000-12-01 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Raja R Harinath <harinath@cs.umn.edu> writes:
> Hi,
>
> It would be nice if the buttons, introduced in the article buffer by
> the "gnus-*-verify-*" functions, had some useful action -- like
> showing the output of the underlying program.
<snip>
mailcrypt will throw an error if a signature doesn't match the associated key in
your PGP/GPG keyring.
A while back I noticed a mailing list manager that was inserting a little
message inside my signature and it was causing errors... really cool. I never
new that it did automatic validation :). If you pay attention it will remove
the PGP signature info and you see it doing it in *messages*
Kevin
- --
Kevin A. Burton ( burton@apache.org, burton@openprivacy.org, burtonator@acm.org )
Cell: 408-910-6145 URL: http://relativity.yi.org ICQ: 73488596
proprietary == evil
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Get my public key at: http://relativity.yi.org/pgpkey.txt
iD8DBQE6JxWkAwM6xb2dfE0RAg+cAJ9UpvXj9Kk4ee3mEYT8qvphhJejWgCgn9CB
loUf0C7vZv9LY/7Y/7t8DmI=
=YXd+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Semtex Qaddafi Kennedy Clinton $400 million in gold bullion arrangements
Ft. Bragg SEAL Team 6 Rule Psix Nazi North Korea ammunition supercomputer kibo
Soviet
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Feature request: "Security" feature
2000-12-01 1:28 ` ShengHuo ZHU
@ 2000-12-01 3:06 ` Michael Welsh Duggan
2000-12-01 4:22 ` ShengHuo ZHU
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michael Welsh Duggan @ 2000-12-01 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu> writes:
> Raja R Harinath <harinath@cs.umn.edu> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It would be nice if the buttons, introduced in the article buffer by
> > the "gnus-*-verify-*" functions, had some useful action -- like
> > showing the output of the underlying program.
> >
> > Say, you have the button
> >
> > [[PGP Verified: OK]]
> >
> > Clicking on it would produce:
> >
> > [[PGP Verified: OK]
> > Good Signature from: John Q. Signer <jqs@foo.com>
> > No trust path established.
> > ]
> >
> > If we don't pay attention to the status bar while it's verifying, we
> > lose this information (looking at *Messages* is more painful than
> > clicking a button in the article).
>
> The problem is how to capture those messages from mailcrypt or gpg.el.
> Anyone knows?
I don't know about mailcrypt, but capturing the information from
gpg.el looks quite easy. In `mml2015-gpg-verify', the `gnus-details'
handle gets set to this information, but only if the signing failed!
If you move the clause:
(mm-set-handle-multipart-parameter
mm-security-handle 'gnus-details
(with-current-buffer mml2015-result-buffer
(buffer-string)))
out of the unless, you should get what you want for free.
--
Michael Duggan
(md5i@cs.cmu.edu)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Feature request: "Security" feature
2000-12-01 3:06 ` Michael Welsh Duggan
@ 2000-12-01 4:22 ` ShengHuo ZHU
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ShengHuo ZHU @ 2000-12-01 4:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
Michael Welsh Duggan <md5i@cs.cmu.edu> writes:
> I don't know about mailcrypt, but capturing the information from
> gpg.el looks quite easy. In `mml2015-gpg-verify', the `gnus-details'
> handle gets set to this information, but only if the signing failed!
> If you move the clause:
> (mm-set-handle-multipart-parameter
> mm-security-handle 'gnus-details
> (with-current-buffer mml2015-result-buffer
> (buffer-string)))
> out of the unless, you should get what you want for free.
Done.
ShengHuo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-01 4:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-11-23 10:07 [PATCH] Expiry-target for nnmh janneke
2000-11-23 15:21 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-11-30 1:50 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-30 19:40 ` Feature request: "Security" feature Raja R Harinath
2000-12-01 1:28 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-12-01 3:06 ` Michael Welsh Duggan
2000-12-01 4:22 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-12-01 3:06 ` Kevin A. Burton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).